e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 31,
2009
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file
number: 1-4219
Harbinger Group Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
74-1339132
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
100 Meridian Centre, Suite 350
Rochester, NY
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
14618
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code
(585) 242-2000
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities
Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o or No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o or No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ or No o.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o or No o.
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company þ
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o
or No
þ
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the
closing price as of the last business day of the registrants
most recently completed second fiscal quarter, June 30,
2009, was approximately $63.5 million. For the sole purpose
of making this calculation, the term non-affiliate
has been interpreted to exclude directors, corporate officers
and holders of 10% or more of the Companys common stock.
As of February 15, 2010, the registrant had outstanding
19,284,850 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value.
Documents Incorporated By Reference: The information required by
Part III of this
Form 10-K,
to the extent not set forth herein, is incorporated by reference
from the registrants definitive proxy statement to be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to
Regulation 14A on or prior to April 30, 2010.
PART I
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE SAFE HARBOR
PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF
1995. This document contains certain forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities
Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Harbinger
Group Inc. (referred to as the Company,
we, us, or our) intends such
forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor
provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and includes
this statement for purposes of such safe harbor provisions.
Forward-looking statements, as such term is defined
by the Securities Exchange Commission (the
Commission) in its rules, regulations and releases,
represent our expectations or beliefs, including, but not
limited to, statements concerning our operations, economic
performance, financial condition, growth and acquisition
strategies, investments and future operational plans, such as
those disclosed under the caption Risk Factors
appearing in Item 1A of Part I of this report. For
this purpose, any statements contained herein that are not
statements of historical fact may be deemed to be
forward-looking statements. Without limiting the generality of
the foregoing, words such as may, will,
expect, believe, anticipate,
intend, could, estimate,
might, or continue or the negative or
other variations thereof or comparable terminology are intended
to identify forward-looking statements. These statements, by
their nature, involve substantial risks and uncertainties,
certain of which are beyond our control, and actual results may
differ materially depending on a variety of important factors,
including uncertainty related to acquisitions, governmental
regulation and any other factors discussed in our filings with
the Commission. These risks and uncertainties include, without
limitation, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
We may not be successful in identifying any suitable acquisition
opportunities and future acquisitions may involve various risks.
|
|
|
|
Volatility in global credit markets may impact our ability to
obtain financing to fund acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
Our Principal Stockholders, as defined in Item 1, hold a
majority of our outstanding common stock and have interests
which may conflict with interests of other stockholders. As a
result of this ownership, we are a controlled
company within the meaning of the NYSE rules and are
exempt from certain corporate governance requirements.
|
|
|
|
Future acquisitions and dispositions may not require a
stockholder vote and may be material to us.
|
|
|
|
The market liquidity for our common stock is relatively low and
may make it difficult to purchase or sell our stock.
|
|
|
|
We may suffer adverse consequences if we are deemed an
investment company and we may incur significant costs to avoid
investment company status.
|
|
|
|
We may be subject to an additional tax as a personal holding
company on future undistributed personal holding company income
if we generate passive income in excess of operating expenses.
|
|
|
|
Agreements and transactions involving former subsidiaries may
give rise to future claims that could materially adversely
impact our capital resources.
|
|
|
|
Litigation defense and settlement costs may be material.
|
|
|
|
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires us
to document and test our internal controls over financial
reporting and to report on our assessment as to the
effectiveness of these controls. Any delays or difficulty in
satisfying these requirements or negative reports concerning our
internal controls could adversely affect our future results of
operations and our stock price.
|
2
General
We were incorporated in Delaware in 1954 under the name Zapata
Corporation (Zapata) and reincorporated in Nevada in
April 1999 under the same name. On December 23, 2009, we
were reincorporated in Delaware under the name Harbinger Group
Inc. For further discussion of the reincorporation, see
Reincorporation Merger, below. Our principal
executive offices are located at 100 Meridian Centre,
Suite 350, Rochester, New York 14618.
We are a holding company with approximately $151.9 million
in consolidated cash, cash equivalents and investments at
December 31, 2009. We currently own approximately 98% of
Zap.Com Corporation (Zap.Com), a public shell
company that may seek businesses or assets to acquire.
In December 2006, we completed the disposition of our 57%
ownership interest in common stock of Omega Protein Corporation.
Since that time, we have held substantially all of our assets in
cash, cash equivalents and investments in U.S. Government
Agency or Treasury securities, and have held no investment
securities as defined by the Investment Company Act of
1940 (the 1940 Act). In addition, we have not held,
and do not hold, ourselves out as an investment company. During
this time, we have conducted a good faith search for an
acquisition or business combination candidate, and have
repeatedly and publicly disclosed our intention to acquire or
combine with such a business. Based on the foregoing, we believe
that we are not an investment company under the 1940 Act.
On July 9, 2009, Harbinger Capital Partners Master
Fund I, Ltd. (Master Fund), Global
Opportunities Breakaway Ltd. (Global Fund) and
Harbinger Capital Partners Special Situations Fund, L.P.
(Special Situations Fund and together with the
Master Fund and Global Fund, our Principal
Stockholders) purchased 9,937,962 shares, or 51.6%,
of our common stock. We refer to this transaction as the
2009 Change of Control. Our Principal Stockholders
subsequently purchased 12,099 additional shares of our common
stock.
Reincorporation Merger. On November 3,
2009, our board of directors and Principal Stockholders approved
the merger of Zapata Corporation (Zapata), a Nevada
corporation, with and into its newly formed wholly-owned
subisidiary, Harbinger Group Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Reincorporation Merger). The Principal Stockholders
approved the Reincorporation Merger by written consent in lieu
of a meeting. On December 23, 2009, the Company completed
the Reincorporation Merger and the Company effectively changed
its name to Harbinger Group Inc. and changed its domicile from
the State of Nevada to the State of Delaware. In connection with
the Reincorporation Merger, our stockholders received one share
of common stock of Harbinger Group Inc. for each share of Zapata
common stock owned at the effective date of the Reincorporation
Merger.
Business Strategy. Our principal focus is to
identify and evaluate business combinations or acquisitions of
businesses. Our new affiliation with our Principal Stockholders
may give us access to new acquisition and business combination
opportunities, which may include businesses which are controlled
by, affiliated with or otherwise known to our Principal
Stockholders. We may review acquisition and business combination
proposals, including those known to our Principal Stockholders,
those presented by third parties and those sought out by us. At
any time, we may be engaged in ongoing discussions with respect
to possible acquisitions or business combinations of widely
varying sizes and in disparate industries. There can be no
assurance that any of these discussions will result in a
definitive purchase agreement and if they do, what the terms or
timing of any agreement would be.
We may pay acquisition consideration in the form of cash, our
debt or equity securities or a combination thereof. In addition,
as a part of our acquisition strategy we may consider raising
additional capital through the issuance of equity or debt
securities, including the issuance of preferred stock. We
believe that our status as a public entity and potential access
to the public equity markets may give us a competitive advantage
over privately-held entities with a similar business objective
to acquire certain target businesses on favorable terms.
We have not focused and do not intend to focus our acquisition
efforts solely on any particular industry. While we generally
focus our attention in the United States, we may investigate
acquisition opportunities outside of the United States when we
believe that such opportunities might be attractive.
In identifying, evaluating and selecting a target business, we
may encounter intense competition from other entities having
similar business objectives such as strategic investors, private
equity groups and special purpose acquisition corporations. Many
of these entities are well established and have extensive
experience identifying and
3
effecting business combinations directly or through affiliates.
Many of these competitors possess greater technical, human and
other resources than us, and our financial resources will be
relatively limited when contrasted with many of these
competitors. Any of these factors may place us at a competitive
disadvantage in successfully negotiating a business combination.
Our Principal Stockholders and their affiliates include other
vehicles that actively are seeking investment opportunities, and
any one of those vehicles may at any time be seeking investment
opportunities similar to those targeted by the Company. Our
directors and officers who are affiliated with our Principal
Stockholders may consider, among other things, asset type and
investment time horizon in evaluating opportunities for the
Company. In recognition of the potential conflicts that these
persons and our other directors may have with respect to
corporate opportunities, our certificate of incorporation
permits our board of directors from time to time to assert or
renounce our interests and expectancies in one or more specific
industries. In accordance with this provision, we have
determined that we will not seek business combinations or
acquisitions of businesses engaged in the wireless
communications industry.
As of the date of this report, due to a variety of factors
including the current global economic and financial market
conditions and the significant deterioration of the credit
markets, competitive pressures, and our limited funds (compared
to many competitors) available for such a transaction, we have
been unable to consummate an acquisition or business combination.
Available Information. We file annual reports
on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K
and amendments to these reports with the Commission. We make
these reports and Section 16 filings by our officers and
directors available free of charge on our website at
www.harbingergroupinc.com as soon as reasonably practicable
after such reports are electronically filed with, or furnished
to, the Commission. Information contained on our website is not
incorporated by reference to this report. This report should be
read in conjunction with the reports and other items filed by us
with the Commission.
In addition, the public may read and copy any materials filed by
us with the Commission at their Public Reference Room at
100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may
obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room
by calling the Commission at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The Commission maintains an Internet site that contains reports,
proxy and information statements, and other information
regarding issuers that file electronically with the Commission
at www.sec.gov.
Employees. At December 31, 2009, we
employed 8 personnel. In the normal course of business, we
use contract personnel to supplement our employee base to meet
our business needs. We believe that our employee relations are
generally satisfactory.
Financial Information About Segments. We
follow the accounting guidance which establishes standards for
reporting information about operating segments in annual
financial statements and related disclosures about products and
services, geographic areas and major customers. We have
determined that we do not have any separately reportable
operating segments.
In examining an investment in our common stock, you should be
aware that there are various risks which could negatively impact
our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition,
including those described below. We urge you to carefully
consider these risk factors together with all of the other
information included in this filing and other risks and
uncertainties identified in our filings made with the
Commission, press releases and public statements made by our
authorized officers before you decide to purchase or make an
investment decision regarding our common stock.
We may
not be successful in identifying any suitable acquisition
opportunities and future acquisitions may involve various
risks.
There is no assurance that we will be successful in identifying
or consummating any suitable acquisitions and, if we do complete
an acquisition, there is no assurance that it will be successful
in enhancing our business or our financial condition. We face
significant competition for acquisition opportunities, which may
inhibit our ability to
4
complete suitable transactions or increase the cost we must pay.
Acquisitions could divert a substantial amount of our management
time and may be difficult for us to integrate. We may issue
additional shares of common stock or other securities in
connection with one or more acquisitions which may dilute the
interest of our existing stockholders.
Depending upon the size and number of any acquisitions, we may
also borrow money to fund acquisitions or to fund operations of
our business. In that event, we would be subject to the risks
normally associated with indebtedness, including the inability
to service the debt or the dedication of a significant amount of
cash flow to service the debt, limits on our ability to secure
future financing and the imposition of various covenants,
including restrictions on our operations.
Volatility
in global credit markets may impact our ability to obtain
financing to fund acquisitions.
Our ability to consummate an acquisition may be largely
dependent on our ability to obtain debt or equity financing. The
current global economic and financial market conditions,
including severe disruptions in the credit markets and the
potential for a significant and prolonged global economic
recession, may impact our ability to raise equity capital or to
obtain sufficient credit to finance an acquisition until the
conditions become more favorable.
Our
Principal Stockholders hold a majority of our outstanding common
stock and have interests which may conflict with interests of
other stockholders. As a result of this ownership, we are a
controlled company within the meaning of the NYSE
rules and are exempt from certain corporate governance
requirements.
Our Principal Stockholders beneficially own shares of
outstanding common stock that collectively constitute more than
50% of our total voting power and, because of this, exercise a
controlling influence over our business and affairs and have the
power to determine all matters submitted to a vote of our
stockholders, including the election of directors, the removal
of directors, and approval of significant corporate transactions
such as amendments to our certificate of incorporation, mergers
and the sale of all or substantially all of our assets. This
concentration of voting power could have the effect of deterring
or preventing a change in control of our company that might
otherwise be beneficial to our stockholders. Moreover, a
majority of the members of our board of directors were nominated
by and are affiliated with or employed by our Principal
Stockholders or their affiliates. Our Principal Stockholders
could cause corporate actions to be taken even if the interests
of these entities conflict with or are not aligned with the
interests or plans of our other stockholders.
Because of our ownership structure, described above, we are
deemed a controlled company under the rules of the
NYSE. As a result, we qualify for, and rely upon, the
controlled company exception to the board of
directors and committee composition requirements under the rules
of the NYSE. Pursuant to this exception, we are exempt from
rules that would otherwise require that our board of directors
be comprised of a majority of independent directors
(as defined under the rules of the NYSE), and that any
compensation committee and corporate governance and nominating
committee be comprised solely of independent
directors, so long as our Principal Stockholders continue
to own more than 50% of our combined voting power.
Future
acquisitions and dispositions may not require a stockholder vote
and may be material to us.
Any acquisitions could be material in size and scope, and since
we have not yet identified any additional assets, property or
business that we may acquire or develop, potential investors
will have virtually no substantive information about any such
new business upon which to base a decision whether to invest in
our common stock. In any event, depending upon the size and
structure of any acquisitions, stockholders may not have the
opportunity to vote on the transaction, and may not have access
to any information about any new business until the transaction
is completed and we file a report with the Commission disclosing
the nature of such transaction
and/or
business. In addition, our certificate of incorporation allows
us to enter into a merger, asset sale, acquisition or lease
transaction with an entity controlled by our Principal
Stockholders without the requirement of a super-majority vote.
5
The
market liquidity for our common stock is relatively low and may
make it difficult to purchase or sell our stock.
The average daily trading volume in our stock during the twelve
month period ended December 31, 2009 was approximately
14,000 shares. Although a more active trading market may
develop in the future, the limited market liquidity for our
stock could affect a stockholders ability to sell at a
price satisfactory to that stockholder.
We may
suffer adverse consequences if we are deemed an investment
company and we may incur significant costs to avoid investment
company status.
Since the December 2006 sale of our Omega shares, we have held
substantially all of our assets in cash, cash equivalents and
investments in U.S. Government Agency and Treasury
securities, and have held no investment securities.
In addition, we have not held, and do not hold, ourself out as
an investment company. We have been conducting a good faith
search for a merger or acquisition candidate, and have
repeatedly and publicly disclosed our intention to acquire a
business. However, as of the date of this report, due to a
variety of factors, we have been unable to consummate such a
transaction. We believe that we are not an investment company
under the 1940 Act. If the Commission or a court were to
disagree with us, we could be required to register as an
investment company. This would negatively affect our ability to
consummate an acquisition of an operating company, subjecting us
to disclosure and accounting guidance geared toward investment,
rather than operating, companies; limiting our ability to borrow
money, issue options, issue multiple classes of stock and debt,
and engage in transactions with affiliates; and requiring us to
undertake significant costs and expenses to meet the disclosure
and regulatory requirements to which we would be subject as a
registered investment company.
We may
be subject to an additional tax as a personal holding company on
future undistributed personal holding company income if we
generate passive income in excess of operating
expenses.
Section 541 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the IRC), subjects a corporation which is a
personal holding company, as defined in the IRC, to
a 15% tax on undistributed personal holding company
income in addition to the corporations normal income
tax. Generally, undistributed personal holding company income is
based on taxable income, subject to certain adjustments, most
notably a reduction for Federal income taxes. Personal holding
company income is comprised primarily of passive investment
income plus, under certain circumstances, personal service
income. A corporation generally is considered to be a personal
holding company (PHC) if (1) 60% or more of its
adjusted ordinary gross income is personal holding company
income and (2) more than 50% in value of its outstanding
common stock is owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer
individuals, as calculated under the applicable tax rule at any
time during the last half of the taxable year.
Although we believe that we are classified as a PHC for 2009, we
did not incur a PHC tax as we had a net operating loss for the
year ended December 31, 2009. Additionally, subsequent to
the 2009 Change of Control, we may continue to qualify as a PHC
in future periods. If it is determined that five or fewer
individuals hold more than 50% in value of our outstanding
common stock during the second half of future tax years, it is
possible that we could have at least 60% of adjusted ordinary
gross income consist of PHC income as discussed above. Thus,
there can be no assurance that we will not be subject to this
tax in the future, which, in turn, may materially and adversely
impact our financial position, results of operations and cash
flows. In addition, if we are subject to this tax during future
periods, statutory tax rate increases could significantly
increase tax expense and adversely affect operating results and
cash flows. Specifically, the current 15% tax rate on
undistributed PHC income is scheduled to expire as of
December 31, 2010, after which the rate will revert back to
the highest individual ordinary income rate of 39.6%.
Agreements
and transactions involving former subsidiaries may give rise to
future claims that could materially adversely impact our capital
resources.
Throughout our history, we have entered into numerous
transactions relating to the sale, disposal or spin-off of
partially and wholly owned subsidiaries. We may have continuing
obligations pursuant to certain of these transactions, including
obligations to indemnify other parties to agreements, and may be
subject to risks resulting from these transactions. For example,
in 2005, we were notified by Weatherford International Inc. of a
claim for reimbursement in connection with the investigation and
cleanup of purported environmental contamination at two
6
properties formerly owned by one of our non-operating
subsidiaries. The claim was made under an indemnification
provision given by us to Weatherford in a 1995 asset purchase
agreement. There can be no assurance that we will not incur
costs and expenses in excess of our reserves in connection with
any continuing obligation.
Litigation
defense and settlement costs may be material.
There can be no assurance that we will prevail in any pending
litigation in which we are involved, or that our insurance
coverage will be adequate to cover any potential losses. To the
extent that we sustain losses from any pending litigation which
are not presently reserved or otherwise provided for or insured
against, our business, results of operations, cash flows
and/or
financial condition could be adversely affected.
Section 404
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires us to document and
test our internal controls over financial reporting and to
report on our assessment as to the effectiveness of these
controls. Any delays or difficulty in satisfying these
requirements or negative reports concerning our internal
controls could adversely affect our future results of operations
and our stock price.
We may in the future discover areas of our internal controls
that need improvement, particularly with respect to businesses
that we may acquire in the future. We cannot be certain that any
remedial measures we take will ensure that we implement and
maintain adequate internal controls over our financial reporting
processes and reporting in the future. Any failure to implement
required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered
in their implementation, could harm our operating results or
cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. If we are
unable to conclude that we have effective internal controls over
financial reporting, or if our independent auditors are unable
to provide us with an unqualified report regarding the
effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting
as required by Section 404, investors could lose confidence
in the reliability of our financial statements, which could
result in a decrease in the market price of our common stock.
Failure to comply with Section 404 could potentially
subject us to sanctions or investigations by the Commission, or
other regulatory authorities, which could also result in a
decrease in the market price of our common stock.
Our previously filed
Form 10-Q/A
for the period ended September 30, 2009 stated that we
did not maintain effective controls over the application and
monitoring of our accounting for income taxes. Specifically, we
did not have controls designed and in place to ensure the
accuracy and completeness of financial information provided by
third party tax advisors used in accounting for income taxes and
the determination of deferred income tax assets and the related
income tax provision and the review and evaluation of the
application of generally accepted accounting principles relating
to accounting for income taxes. This control deficiency resulted
in the restatement of our unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements for the quarter ended September 30,
2009. Accordingly, we determined that this control deficiency
constituted a material weakness as of September 30, 2009.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we have
concluded that our ongoing remediation efforts resulted in
control enhancements which have operated for an adequate period
of time to demonstrate operating effectiveness. Although we
believe that this material weakness has been remediated, there
can be no assurance that similar weaknesses will not occur in
the future which could adversely affect our future results of
operations or our stock price.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
Our corporate headquarters are located in Rochester, New York
where we lease approximately 3,000 square feet of office
space which is adequate and suitable for our current level of
operations. We plan to move our headquarters to New York, New
York during the second quarter of 2010.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
We are subject to various claims and litigation relating to our
past and current operations, which are being handled and
vigorously defended in the ordinary course of business. While
the results of any ultimate resolution cannot be predicted, as
of December 31, 2009 it is the opinion of management, based
upon discussions with counsel,
7
that any losses resulting from these matters will not have a
material adverse effect on our financial position or results of
operations.
|
|
Item 4.
|
(Removed
and Reserved)
|
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Market
Information and Dividends
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE) and trades under the symbol HRG.
Prior to our Reincorporation Merger on December 23, 2009,
our stock traded under the symbol ZAP. The high and
low sales prices for our common stock for each quarterly period
for the last two years are shown in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
6.95
|
|
|
$
|
5.55
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
7.56
|
|
|
|
5.71
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
7.56
|
|
|
|
6.80
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
7.30
|
|
|
|
6.65
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
7.34
|
|
|
$
|
6.75
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
7.31
|
|
|
|
6.81
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
7.14
|
|
|
|
6.41
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
4.96
|
|
We have not declared any dividends since our board of directors
discontinued dividend payments in 1998 and we do not anticipate
paying dividends in the foreseeable future.
In 2002, our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to
4.0 million shares of our outstanding common stock in the
open market or privately negotiated transactions. No shares were
repurchased under this authorization and our board of directors
terminated this authorization on November 3, 2009.
As of February 15, 2010, there were approximately 1,800
holders of record of common stock. This number does not include
the stockholders for whom shares are held in a
nominee or street name.
8
Securities
Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation
Plans
The following table sets forth information with respect to
compensation plans under which our equity securities are
authorized for issuance as of December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities Remaining
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities to Be
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Available for Future Issuance
|
|
|
|
Issued Upon Exercise of
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Under Equity Compensation
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Plans (Excluding Securities
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
Warrants and Rights(a)
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights(b)
|
|
|
Reflected in Column (a))(c)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
$
|
5.49
|
|
|
|
5,863
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
$
|
5.49
|
|
|
|
5,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
The following table sets forth certain selected historic
financial information for the periods and as of the dates
presented and should be read in conjunction with our
Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes thereto
included in Item 8 of this report and with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations included in
Item 7 of this report. All amounts are in thousands, except
for per share amounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009(1)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006(2)
|
|
|
2005(3)
|
|
|
Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(6,290
|
)
|
|
|
(3,237
|
)
|
|
|
(3,388
|
)
|
|
|
(4,730
|
)
|
|
|
(5,517
|
)
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations
|
|
|
(13,344
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
2,551
|
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
|
|
(3,112
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,390
|
)
|
|
|
(6,064
|
)
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(13,347
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
2,550
|
|
|
|
(4,664
|
)
|
|
|
(9,177
|
)
|
Net (loss) income attributable to Harbinger Group Inc.
|
|
|
(13,344
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
2,551
|
|
|
|
(4,663
|
)
|
|
|
(9,176
|
)
|
Net (loss) income per share basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations
|
|
|
(0.69
|
)
|
|
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
(0.16
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
|
(0.32
|
)
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(0.69
|
)
|
|
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
|
(0.48
|
)
|
Balance Sheet Data (as of year end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
141,947
|
|
|
$
|
153,908
|
|
|
$
|
154,275
|
|
|
$
|
150,490
|
|
|
$
|
155,503
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
152,883
|
|
|
|
164,032
|
|
|
|
165,444
|
|
|
|
163,731
|
|
|
|
304,756
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
145,797
|
|
|
|
158,847
|
|
|
|
162,133
|
|
|
|
159,302
|
|
|
|
231,621
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The 2009 Change of Control resulted in a change of ownership
under sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code. As a
result, we wrote off approximately $7.4 million of net
operating loss carryforward tax benefits and alternative minimum
tax credits. Additionally, as a result of cumulative losses in
recent years, we increased our valuation allowance for our
deferred tax assets by $2.8 million. |
|
(2) |
|
During 2006, we sold our approximate 57% ownership interest in
Omega Protein Corporation in two separate transactions for
combined proceeds of $75.5 million. In conjunction with the
sale, we recognized transaction related losses of
$10.3 million ($7.2 million net of tax adjustments).
Such amounts are included under loss from discontinued
operations for the year ended December 31, 2006. |
|
(3) |
|
During 2005, we sold our approximate 77% ownership interest in
Safety Components International, Inc. for proceeds of
$51.2 million. Accordingly, we recognized a loss on sale of
$12.2 million ($9.9 million net of tax effects). Such
amounts are included under loss from discontinued operations for
the year ended December 31, 2005. |
|
(4) |
|
Loss from discontinued operations includes transaction related
losses as discussed in notes (2) and (3) and the
operating results for Omega Protein Corporation and Safety
Components International, Inc. for both 2006 and 2005. |
10
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation
|
The following is a discussion of our financial condition and
results of operations. This discussion should be read in
conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements included
in Item 8 of this report. This discussion contains
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
Actual results could differ materially from those discussed
herein. Factors that could cause or contribute to such
differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed
above in Part I, Item 1A., Risk Factors,
as well as those discussed in this section and elsewhere in this
report.
Overview
We are a holding company with approximately $151.9 million
in consolidated cash, cash equivalents and investments at
December 31, 2009. We currently own approximately 98% of
Zap.Com, a public shell company.
In December 2006, we completed the disposition of our 57%
ownership interest in common stock of Omega Protein Corporation.
Since that time, we have held substantially all of our assets in
cash, cash equivalents and investments in U.S. Government
Agency or Treasury securities, and have held no investment
securities (as that term is defined in the 1940 Act). In
addition, we have not held, and do not hold, ourselves out as an
investment company. During this time, we have conducted a good
faith search for an acquisition or business combination
candidate, and have repeatedly and publicly disclosed our
intention to acquire or combine with such a business. Based on
the foregoing, we believe that we are not an investment company
under the 1940 Act.
On July 9, 2009, our Principal Stockholders purchased
9,937,962 shares, or 51.6%, of our common stock during the
2009 Change of Control. Our Principal Stockholders subsequently
purchased 12,099 additional shares of our common stock.
Our principal focus is to identify and evaluate business
combinations or acquisitions of businesses. We expect that
management associated with our Principal Stockholders will
assist us in identifying acquisition and business combination
opportunities, which may include businesses which are controlled
by, affiliated with or otherwise known to our Principal
Stockholders, and we also have engaged third parties to assist
us in this effort. At any time, we may be engaged in ongoing
discussions with respect to possible acquisitions or business
combinations of widely varying sizes and in disparate
industries. There can be no assurance that any of these
discussions will result in a definitive purchase agreement and
if they do, what the terms or timing of any agreement would be.
We may pay acquisition consideration in the form of cash, our
debt or equity securities or a combination thereof. In addition,
as a part of our acquisition strategy we may consider raising
additional capital through the issuance of equity or debt
securities, including the issuance of preferred stock.
We have not focused and do not intend to focus our acquisition
efforts solely on any particular industry. While we generally
focus our attention in the United States, we may investigate
acquisition opportunities outside of the United States when we
believe that such opportunities may be attractive.
Our Principal Stockholders and their affiliates include other
vehicles that actively are seeking investment opportunities, and
any one of those vehicles may at any time be seeking investment
opportunities similar to those targeted by the Company. Our
directors and officers who are affiliated with our Principal
Stockholders may consider, among other things, asset type and
investment time horizon in evaluating opportunities for the
Company. In recognition of the potential conflicts that these
persons and our other directors may have with respect to
corporate opportunities, the certificate of incorporation for
Harbinger Group Inc. permits our board of directors from time to
time to assert or renounce our interests and expectancies in one
or more specific industries. In accordance with this provision,
we have determined that we will not seek business combinations
or acquisitions of businesses engaged in the wireless
communications industry.
11
Results
of Operations
Presented below is a table that summarizes our results of
operations and compares the amount of the change between 2009
and 2008 (the 2009 Change) and between 2008 and 2007
(the 2008 Change).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
6,290
|
|
|
|
3,237
|
|
|
|
3,388
|
|
|
|
3,053
|
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
6,290
|
|
|
|
3,237
|
|
|
|
3,388
|
|
|
|
3,053
|
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(6,290
|
)
|
|
|
(3,237
|
)
|
|
|
(3,388
|
)
|
|
|
(3,053
|
)
|
|
|
151
|
|
Other income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
3,013
|
|
|
|
7,681
|
|
|
|
(2,784
|
)
|
|
|
(4,668
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
1,167
|
|
|
|
(457
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
3,126
|
|
|
|
8,251
|
|
|
|
(1,617
|
)
|
|
|
(5,125
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(4,781
|
)
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
4,863
|
|
|
|
(4,670
|
)
|
|
|
(4,974
|
)
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(8,566
|
)
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
(2,313
|
)
|
|
|
(8,664
|
)
|
|
|
2,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(13,347
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
2,550
|
|
|
|
(13,334
|
)
|
|
|
(2,563
|
)
|
Less: Net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to Harbinger Group Inc.
|
|
$
|
(13,344
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,551
|
|
|
$
|
(13,332
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,563
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per common share basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.69
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
(0.69
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
Compared to 2008
We reported a net loss of $13.3 million or $(0.69) per
diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared
to a net loss of $12,000 or $0.00 per diluted share in 2008. The
increase in net loss resulted from the write off of
$7.4 million of net operating loss carryforward tax
benefits and alternative minimum tax credits resulting from the
2009 Change of Control which constituted a change of ownership
under sections 382 and 383 of the IRC. Additionally, as a
result of cumulative losses in recent years, we increased our
valuation allowance for our deferred tax assets by
$2.8 million during the fourth quarter of 2009. The
increase in net loss also resulted from increases in
professional fees and pension expenses and a decrease in
interest income, all partially offset by the recognition of
other income in 2009 related to former businesses of the Company.
The following presents a more detailed discussion of our
operating results:
Revenues. For the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, we had no revenues. We sold our
remaining operating business in December 2006 and we do not
expect to recognize revenues until we acquire one or more
operating businesses.
Cost of revenues. For the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, we had no cost of revenues.
General and administrative expenses. General
and administrative expenses consist primarily of professional
fees (including advisory services, legal and accounting fees),
salaries and benefits, pension expense and insurance costs.
General and administrative expenses increased $3.1 million
from $3.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008
to $6.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009.
This increase was primarily a result
12
of increases in professional fees of $1.9 million,
predominately arising from the 2009 Change of Control, the
transition to a reconstituted board of directors, the
Reincorporation Merger, and increased efforts in evaluating
possible business acquisitions, and an increase of
$0.9 million in actuarially determined pension expenses. We
expect general and administrative expenses to increase
substantially as a result of fees associated with advisors we
have and will retain to assist us in evaluating business
acquisition opportunities. In addition, our planned relocation
of our corporate headquarters to New York, New York during the
second quarter of 2010 will result in additional general and
administrative expenses.
Interest income. Interest income decreased
$2.8 million from $3.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008 to $0.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009, resulting from sustained lower interest
rates on our cash equivalents and investments which are invested
principally in U.S. Government instruments.
Other, net. Other, net was $1.3 million
and $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively. During 2009, we received a refund of
excess collateral of $0.8 million from a
rent-a-captive
insurance arrangement which we entered into in 1993. As we had
previously written off the balance of our excess collateral, the
full amount of this refund was recorded as other income. We do
not believe we have any material obligations under this
arrangement and do not expect to receive any additional material
reimbursements related to this program. Also during 2009, we
received $0.3 million from settlement agreements entered
into during 2009 in which we agreed to accept a payment in
exchange for the termination of insurance coverage on certain
non-operating subsidiaries.
Income taxes. Despite a pretax loss of
$4.8 million, we recorded a provision for income taxes of
$8.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009
compared to a benefit for income taxes of $0.1 million for
the prior year. The change from a benefit to a provision
resulted primarily from the write-off of $7.4 million of
net operating loss carryforward tax benefits and alternative
minimum tax credits resulting from the 2009 Change of Control
which constituted a change in ownership under sections 382
and 383 of the IRC. Additionally, as a result of our cumulative
losses, we have determined that, as of December 31, 2009, a
valuation allowance of approximately $2.8 million was
required for deferred tax assets whose realization did not meet
the more likely than not criteria.
2008
Compared to 2007
We reported a net loss of $12,000 or $0.00 per diluted share for
the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to net income of
$2.6 million or $0.13 per diluted share in 2007. The change
from net income to net loss resulted primarily from decreased
interest income during 2008 compared to 2007.
The following presents a more detailed discussion of our
operating results:
Revenues. For the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, we had no revenues.
Cost of revenues. For the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, we had no cost of revenues.
General and administrative expenses. General
and administrative expenses decreased $0.2 million from
$3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 to
$3.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 as a
result of decreases in professional fees and costs.
Interest income. Interest income decreased
$4.7 million from $7.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 to $3.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008. This decrease was primarily attributable
to sustained lower interest rates on cash equivalents and
investments during 2008 compared to 2007. In July 2008, due to
market conditions and in an effort to preserve principal, we
liquidated our U.S. Government Agency securities and
purchased U.S. Treasury securities with the proceeds.
Other, net. Other, net decreased
$0.5 million from $0.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 to $0.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008. This decrease resulted from higher
levels of insurance and other recoveries recognized during 2007
compared to 2008.
Income taxes. The Company recorded a benefit
for income taxes of $0.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008 compared to a provision for income taxes
of $2.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.
The change from a provision to a benefit for income taxes was
attributable to the pretax loss in the year ended
13
December 31, 2008 compared to pretax income in 2007.
Additionally, the loss in 2008 resulted in no additional
provision for a 15% tax on undistributed personal holding
company income for the year ended December 31, 2008 as was
required for 2007.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our liquidity needs are primarily for professional fees
(including advisory services, legal and accounting fees),
salaries and benefits, pension expense and insurance costs. We
may also utilize a significant portion of our cash, cash
equivalents and investments to fund all or a portion of the cost
of any future acquisitions.
The following table summarizes information about our contractual
obligations (in thousands) as of December 31, 2009 and the
effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity
and cash flow in future periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
1 to 3
|
|
|
3 to 5
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
Contractual Obligations(1)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Advisory services(2)
|
|
$
|
3,850
|
|
|
$
|
3,850
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Pension liabilities(3)
|
|
|
3,623
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
3,157
|
|
Retirement agreement(4)
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations(5)
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
7,964
|
|
|
$
|
4,112
|
|
|
$
|
416
|
|
|
$
|
279
|
|
|
$
|
3,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We also have $0.7 million of potential obligations related
to uncertain tax positions for which the timing and amount of
payment cannot be reasonably estimated due to the nature of the
uncertainties. See Note 10 to our consolidated financial
statements included in Item 8 of this report. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents contractual amounts payable for financial advisory
services. |
|
(3) |
|
For more information concerning pension liabilities, see
Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included
in Item 8 of this report. |
|
(4) |
|
Amounts in this category relate to a retirement agreement
entered into in 1981 with a former executive officer of ours. |
|
(5) |
|
For more information concerning operating leases, see
Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements included
in Item 8 of this report. |
Our current source of liquidity is our cash, cash equivalents
and investments. Because we limit our investments principally to
U.S. Government instruments, we do not expect to earn
significant interest income in the near term. We expect these
assets to continue to be a source of liquidity except to the
extent that they may be used to fund the acquisition of
operating businesses or assets. As of December 31, 2009,
our cash, cash equivalents and investments were
$151.9 million compared to $154.7 million as of
December 31, 2008.
Based on current levels of operations, we do not have any
significant capital expenditure commitments and management
believes that our consolidated cash, cash equivalents and
investments on hand will be adequate to fund our operational and
capital requirements for at least the next twelve months.
Depending on the size and terms of future acquisitions of
operating businesses or assets, we may raise additional capital
through the issuance of equity or debt. There is no assurance,
however, that such capital will be available at the time, in the
amounts necessary or with terms satisfactory to us.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Throughout our history, we have entered into indemnifications in
the ordinary course of business with our customers, suppliers,
service providers, business partners and in certain instances,
when we sold businesses. Additionally, we have indemnified our
directors and officers who are, or were, serving at our request
in such capacities. Although the specific terms or number of
such arrangements is not precisely known due to the extensive
history of our past operations, costs incurred to settle claims
related to these indemnifications have not been material to our
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Further, we have no reason to believe that
14
future costs to settle claims related to our former operations
will have material impact on our financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
Summary
of Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our consolidated cash flow
information for the last three years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash (used in) provided by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
(2,694
|
)
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
2,182
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(12,068
|
)
|
|
|
3,054
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash Equivalents
|
|
$
|
(14,762
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,443
|
|
|
$
|
2,362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities.
Cash used in operating activities was $2.7 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009 compared to cash provided by
operating activities of $0.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008. The change from cash provided by
operating activities to cash used in operating activities
resulted principally from lower interest income and higher
administrative expenses during 2009 compared to 2008.
Cash provided by operating activities was $0.4 million and
$2.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and
2007, respectively. This decrease resulted principally from
lower interest income during 2008 compared to 2007.
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities.
Variations in our net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities are typically the result of the change in mix of
cash, cash equivalents and investments during the period. All
highly liquid investments with original maturities of three
months or less are considered to be cash equivalents and all
investments with original maturities of greater than three
months are classified as either short- or long-term investments.
Cash used in investing activities was $12.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009 compared to cash provided by
investing activities of $3.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008. This change from cash used in investing
activities to cash provided by investing activities resulted
from additional purchases of investments during 2009 compared to
2008.
Cash provided by investing activities was $3.1 million and
$0.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and
2007, respectively. This increase resulted from additional
purchases and sales of short-term investments during 2008
compared to 2007.
Other than possible acquisitions of operating businesses or
assets, we do not expect any significant capital expenditures
during 2010.
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities.
There was no cash provided by (used in) financing activities for
the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 or 2007.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
As of the date of this report, there are no recent accounting
pronouncements that have not yet been adopted that we believe
may have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
15
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition,
liquidity and results of operations are based upon our
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. The preparation of these financial
statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect amounts reported therein. The following lists our
current accounting policies involving significant management
judgment and provides a brief description of these policies:
Litigation and environmental reserves. The
establishment of litigation and environmental reserves requires
judgments concerning the ultimate outcome of pending claims
against the Company and our subsidiaries. In applying judgment,
management utilizes opinions and estimates obtained from outside
legal counsel to apply the appropriate accounting for
contingencies. Accordingly, estimated amounts relating to
certain claims have met the criteria for the recognition of a
liability. Other claims for which a liability has not been
recognized are reviewed on an ongoing basis in accordance with
accounting guidance. A liability is recognized for all
associated legal costs as incurred. Liabilities for litigation
settlements, environmental settlements, legal fees and changes
in these estimated amounts may have a material impact on our
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
If the actual cost of settling these matters, whether resulting
from adverse judgments or otherwise, differs from the reserves
totaling $0.3 million we have accrued as of
December 31, 2009, that difference will be reflected in our
results of operations when the matter is resolved or when our
estimate of the cost changes.
Deferred income taxes. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable
income in the years in which the temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in the tax rates is
recognized in earnings in the period that includes the enactment
date. Additionally, taxing jurisdictions could retroactively
disagree with our tax treatment of certain items, and some
historical transactions have income tax effects going forward.
Accounting guidance require these future effects to be evaluated
using current laws, rules and regulations, each of which can
change at any time and in an unpredictable manner.
Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when,
in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that
some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. Cumulative losses weigh heavily in the overall
assessment of the need for a valuation allowance. As a result of
our cumulative losses in recent years, we determined that, as of
December 31, 2009, a valuation allowance was required for
all of our deferred tax assets other than the refundable
alternative minimum tax credits. Consequently, our valuation
allowance, which related only to state net operating loss
carryforward tax benefits in previous years, increased from
$7,000 as of December 31, 2008 to $2.7 million as of
December 31, 2009.
We also apply the accounting guidance for uncertain tax
positions which prescribes a minimum recognition threshold a tax
position is required to meet before being recognized in the
financial statements. It also provides information on
derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and
transition. Accrued interest expense and penalties related to
uncertain tax positions are recorded in (Provision)
benefit for income taxes. Our reserve for uncertain tax
positions totaled $0.7 million as of December 31, 2009
and 2008.
Defined benefit plan assumptions. We have two
defined benefit plans, under which participants earn a
retirement benefit based upon a formula set forth in each plan.
We record income or expense related to these plans using
actuarially determined amounts that are calculated using the
accounting guidance for pensions. Key assumptions used in the
actuarial valuations include the discount rate and the
anticipated rate of return on plan assets. These rates are based
on market interest rates, and therefore fluctuations in market
interest rates could impact the amount of pension income or
expense recorded for these plans. Despite our belief that our
estimates are reasonable for these key actuarial assumptions,
future actual results may differ from our estimates, and these
differences could be material to our future financial statements.
The discount rate enables a company to state expected future
cash flows at a present value on the measurement date. We have
little latitude in selecting this rate as it is based on a
review of projected cash flows and on high-
16
quality fixed income investments at the measurement date. A
lower discount rate increases the present value of benefit
obligations and increases pension expense. The expected
long-term rate of return reflects the average rate of earnings
expected on funds invested or to be invested in the pension
plans to provide for the benefits included in the pension
liability. We establish the expected long-term rate of return at
the beginning of each year based upon information available to
us at that time, including the plans investment mix and
the forecasted rates of return on these types of securities.
Differences in actual experience or changes in the assumptions
may materially affect our financial position or results of
operations. Actual results that differ from the actuarial
assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods
and, therefore, generally affect recognized expense and the
recorded obligation in future periods. For example, due to
significant adverse market conditions during 2008, our pension
expense significantly increased during 2009. A significant
component of the increase was caused by the amortization of
actuarial losses which reflects the increase in the accumulated
differences in actual plan results compared to assumptions
utilized in previous years.
We continually update and assess the facts and circumstances
regarding these critical accounting matters and other
significant accounting matters affecting estimates in our
financial statements.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
Not required for Smaller Reporting Companies.
17
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
INDEX TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
18
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Harbinger Group Inc.
Rochester, NY
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of
Harbinger Group Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company)
as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. The Companys management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the companys board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2009, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2009 of the Company and our report date
February 26, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on those
financial statements.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Rochester, New York
February 26, 2010
19
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Harbinger Group, Inc.
Rochester, NY
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Harbinger Group Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company)
as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, changes in equity and
comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Harbinger Group Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2009
and 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2009, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission and our report dated February 26, 2010 expressed
an unqualified opinion on the Companys internal control
over financial reporting.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Rochester, New York
February 26, 2010
20
HARBINGER
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and
|
|
|
|
per share amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 3)
|
|
$
|
127,932
|
|
|
$
|
142,694
|
|
Short-term investments (Note 4)
|
|
|
15,952
|
|
|
|
11,965
|
|
Non-trade receivables (Notes 4 and 5)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets (Note 10)
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
144,414
|
|
|
|
155,045
|
|
Long-term investments (Note 5)
|
|
|
8,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $7
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets (Note 10)
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
8,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
152,883
|
|
|
$
|
164,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
593
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
Accrued and other current liabilities (Note 6)
|
|
|
1,874
|
|
|
|
1,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
2,467
|
|
|
|
1,137
|
|
Pension liabilities (Note 12)
|
|
|
3,519
|
|
|
|
2,904
|
|
Other liabilities (Note 7)
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
7,086
|
|
|
|
5,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harbinger Group Inc. stockholders equity (Note 8):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par; 10,000,000 and
1,600,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively; none issued or outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preference stock, $.01 par; 0 and 14,400,000 shares
authorized at December 31, 2009 and 2008; none issued or
outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par, 500,000,000 and
132,000,000 shares authorized; 19,284,850 and
24,708,414 shares issued; and 19,284,850 and
19,276,334 shares outstanding at December 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
132,638
|
|
|
|
164,250
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
23,848
|
|
|
|
37,192
|
|
Common stock held in treasury, at cost, 0 and
5,432,080 shares at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,668
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (Note 12)
|
|
|
(10,912
|
)
|
|
|
(11,207
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Harbinger Group Inc. stockholders equity
|
|
|
145,767
|
|
|
|
158,814
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
145,797
|
|
|
|
158,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
152,883
|
|
|
$
|
164,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
21
HARBINGER
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative (Notes 11, 12, 13 and 14)
|
|
|
6,290
|
|
|
|
3,237
|
|
|
|
3,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
6,290
|
|
|
|
3,237
|
|
|
|
3,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(6,290
|
)
|
|
|
(3,237
|
)
|
|
|
(3,388
|
)
|
Other income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
3,013
|
|
|
|
7,681
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
3,126
|
|
|
|
8,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(4,781
|
)
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
4,863
|
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes (Note 10)
|
|
|
(8,566
|
)
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
(2,313
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(13,347
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
2,550
|
|
Less: Net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest
(Note 2)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to Harbinger Group Inc.
|
|
$
|
(13,344
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per common share basic and diluted
(Note 9)
|
|
$
|
(0.69
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
19,280
|
|
|
|
19,276
|
|
|
|
19,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
19,280
|
|
|
|
19,276
|
|
|
|
19,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
22
HARBINGER
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(13,347
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,550
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Taxes paid in connection with stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
8,542
|
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
1,617
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-trade receivables
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
(745
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(184
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
Pension liabilities
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Accrued liabilities and other current liabilities
|
|
|
829
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(665
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
|
|
(2,694
|
)
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
2,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
(28,065
|
)
|
|
|
(302,064
|
)
|
|
|
(288,564
|
)
|
Maturities of investments
|
|
|
16,039
|
|
|
|
305,118
|
|
|
|
288,744
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(12,068
|
)
|
|
|
3,054
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(14,762
|
)
|
|
|
3,443
|
|
|
|
2,362
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
142,694
|
|
|
|
139,251
|
|
|
|
136,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
127,932
|
|
|
$
|
142,694
|
|
|
$
|
139,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
|
$
|
1,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
23
HARBINGER
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Held in
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
controlling
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
|
24,617
|
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
$
|
164,454
|
|
|
$
|
34,653
|
|
|
$
|
(31,668
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,417
|
)
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
159,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
2,550
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,550
|
|
Actuarial adjustments to pension plans, net of tax effects
(Note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
Stock-based compensation (Note 14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option net exercises (Note 14)
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(221
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,033
|
|
Less: Comprehensive loss attributable to the noncontrolling
interest (Note 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income attributable to Harbinger Group,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
24,709
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
164,250
|
|
|
|
37,204
|
|
|
|
(31,668
|
)
|
|
|
(7,934
|
)
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
162,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
Actuarial adjustments to pension plans, net of tax effects
(Note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,273
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,273
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3,273
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,286
|
)
|
Less: Comprehensive loss attributable to the noncontrolling
interest (Note 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss attributable to Harbinger Group,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,285
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
24,709
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
164,250
|
|
|
|
37,192
|
|
|
|
(31,668
|
)
|
|
|
(11,207
|
)
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
158,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,344
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(13,347
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(13,347
|
)
|
Treasury stock retirement (Note 8)
|
|
|
(5,432
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(31,614
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option net exercises (Note 14)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial adjustments to pension plans, net of tax effects
(Note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
Stock-based compensation (Note 14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,052
|
)
|
Less: Comprehensive loss attributable to the noncontrolling
interest (Note 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss attributable to Harbinger Group,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13,049
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
19,285
|
|
|
$
|
193
|
|
|
$
|
132,638
|
|
|
$
|
23,848
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(10,912
|
)
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
145,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
24
HARBINGER
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
Note 1.
|
Business
and Organization
|
Harbinger Group Inc. (which, together with its consolidated
subsidiaries, is referred to as the Company) is a
holding company with approximately $151.9 million in
consolidated cash, cash equivalents and investments at
December 31, 2009. The Companys principal focus is to
identify and evaluate business combinations or acquisitions of
businesses. The Company currently owns 98% of Zap.Com
Corporation (Zap.Com), a public shell company that
may seek assets or businesses to acquire.
On December 23, 2009, the Company completed a
reincorporation merger with Zapata Corporation (the
Reincorporation Merger). As a result, the
Companys name changed from Zapata Corporation to Harbinger
Group Inc. and the Company changed its domicile from the State
of Nevada to the State of Delaware. See Note 8.
On July 9, 2009, Harbinger Capital Partners Master
Fund I, Ltd. (Master Fund), Global
Opportunities Breakaway Ltd. (Global Fund) and
Harbinger Capital Partners Special Situations Fund, L.P.
(Special Situations Fund and together with the
Master Fund and Global Fund, the Companys Principal
Stockholders) purchased 9,937,962 shares, or 51.6%,
of the Companys common stock (the 2009 Change of
Control). The Companys Principal Stockholders
subsequently purchased 12,099 additional shares of the
Companys common stock.
|
|
Note 2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies
|
Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Harbinger Group Inc., its 98% owned subsidiary, Zap.Com,
and certain wholly-owned non-operating subsidiaries and are
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). All
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted new accounting
guidance which changed the accounting and reporting for minority
interests in consolidated subsidiaries. Under the new guidance,
ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than
the Company are classified as a component of equity in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets titled Noncontrolling
interest. The Consolidated Statements of Operations
include the line items Net (loss) income, which
represents net (loss) income attributable to both the Company
and the noncontrolling interest in Zap.Com, Net loss
attributable to the noncontrolling interest and Net
(loss) income attributable to Harbinger Group Inc., which
is the same amount as would be reported under the prior
definition of Net income (loss). In addition, prior
period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the
requirements of the new guidance.
The Company follows the accounting guidance which establishes
standards for reporting information about operating segments in
annual financial statements and related disclosures about
products and services, geographic areas and major customers. The
Company has determined that it does not have any separately
reportable operating segments.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The Company principally invests its excess cash in
U.S. Government instruments. All highly liquid investments
with original maturities of three months or less are considered
to be cash equivalents.
Investments
A portion of the Companys investments are held in
U.S. Government instruments with maturities greater than
three months. As the Company has both the intent and the ability
to hold these securities to maturity, they are considered
held-to-maturity
investments. Such investments are recorded at original cost plus
accrued interest, which is included in Non-trade
receivables.
25
HARBINGER
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Income
Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the
expected future tax consequences of temporary differences
between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and
liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in
which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax
assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion
of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or
all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
The Company also applies the accounting guidance for uncertain
tax positions which prescribes a minimum recognition threshold a
tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the
financial statements. It also provides information on
derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and
transition. Accrued interest expense and penalties related to
uncertain tax positions are recorded in (Provision)
benefit for income taxes.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Due to the inherent
uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual results in
future periods could differ from these estimates.
The Companys significant estimates which are susceptible
to change in the near term relate to (1) estimates of
reserves for litigation and environmental reserves (see
Note 11), (2) recognition of deferred tax assets and
related valuation allowances (see Note 10), and
(3) assumptions used in the actuarial valuations for
defined benefit plans (see Note 12).
Concentrations
of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk include the Companys cash,
cash equivalents and investments. These funds are currently
concentrated among three financial institutions; however, the
majority of the Companys funds are invested in
U.S. Government Treasuries, backed by the full faith and
credit of the U.S. Government, which are held by these
financial institutions on behalf of the Company.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
There are no recent accounting pronouncements that have not yet
been adopted that the Company believes may have a material
impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Reclassifications
In addition to the retrospective reclassifications made in
connection with the Companys adoption of the new
accounting guidance for noncontrolling interests disclosed under
Consolidation above, certain other reclassifications
have been made to prior year financial information to conform to
the current year presentation. Specifically, in the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for 2008 and 2007, the change in
prepaid pension cost was previously classified within the change
in Other assets and is now classified within the
change in Pension liabilities.
Subsequent
Events
The Company evaluated subsequent events through the date when
the financial statements were issued.
26
HARBINGER
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 3.
|
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
|
All highly liquid investments with original maturities of three
months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. The
Companys cash and cash equivalents at December 31,
2009 and December 31, 2008 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury Bills
|
|
$
|
127,593
|
|
|
$
|
127,591
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
Treasury money market
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
Checking accounts
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
127,932
|
|
|
$
|
127,930
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009, amortized cost shown above
included no accrued interest. Interest rates on the
Companys Treasury Bills were 0.00% at December 31,
2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury Bills
|
|
$
|
142,680
|
|
|
$
|
142,675
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
Treasury money market
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Checking accounts
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
142,694
|
|
|
$
|
142,689
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008, amortized cost shown above
included no accrued interest. Interest rates on the
Companys Treasury Bills ranged from -0.10% to 0.00% at
December 31, 2008.
|
|
Note 4.
|
Short-Term
Investments
|
As of December 31, 2009, the Company had
held-to-maturity
investments with maturities up to approximately 10 months.
Interest rates on the Companys short-term investments
ranged from 0.38% to 0.62% at December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
(Loss) Gain
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury Notes
|
|
$
|
7,949
|
|
|
$
|
7,905
|
|
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
U.S. Treasury Bills
|
|
|
8,007
|
|
|
|
8,011
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments
|
|
|
15,956
|
|
|
$
|
15,916
|
|
|
$
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: interest receivable included in Non-trade
receivables
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments, at cost
|
|
$
|
15,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
HARBINGER
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of December 31, 2008, the Company had
held-to-maturity
investments with maturities up to approximately six months.
Interest rates on the Companys short-term investments
ranged from 1.70% to 2.05% at December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
(Loss) Gain
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury Notes
|
|
$
|
8,009
|
|
|
$
|
7,976
|
|
|
$
|
(33
|
)
|
U.S. Treasury Bills
|
|
|
4,031
|
|
|
|
4,032
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments
|
|
|
12,040
|
|
|
$
|
12,008
|
|
|
$
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: interest receivable included in Non-trade
receivables
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments, at cost
|
|
$
|
11,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5.
|
Long-Term
Investments
|
As of December 31, 2009, the Company had
held-to-maturity
investments with maturities up to approximately 1.3 years.
Interest rates on the Companys long-term investments
ranged from 0.44% to 0.60% at December 31, 2009. The
Company held no long-term investments at December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury Notes
|
|
$
|
8,056
|
|
|
$
|
8,018
|
|
|
$
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term investments
|
|
|
8,056
|
|
|
$
|
8,018
|
|
|
$
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: interest receivable included in Non-trade
receivables
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term investments, at cost
|
|
$
|
8,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6.
|
Accrued
and Other Current Liabilities
|
Accrued and other current liabilities are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
$
|
578
|
|
|
$
|
574
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Legal and environmental reserves
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Salary and benefits
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
Retirement agreement
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
Pension accrual
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
Director and committee fees
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal and state income taxes
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,874
|
|
|
$
|
1,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
HARBINGER
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 7.
|
Other
Liabilities
|
Other liabilities are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Uncertain tax positions
|
|
$
|
732
|
|
|
$
|
732
|
|
Retirement agreement
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
Other
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,100
|
|
|
$
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On November 3, 2009, the Companys board of directors
and Principal Stockholders approved the Reincorporation Merger
of Zapata Corporation (Zapata), a Nevada
corporation, with and into its newly formed wholly-owned
subsidiary, Harbinger Group Inc., a Delaware corporation. The
Principal Stockholders approved the Reincorporation Merger by
written consent in lieu of a meeting. On December 23, 2009,
the Company completed the Reincorporation Merger and the Company
effectively changed its name to Harbinger Group Inc. and changed
its domicile from the State of Nevada to the State of Delaware.
In connection with the Reincorporation Merger, stockholders
received one share of common stock of Harbinger Group Inc. for
each share of Zapata common stock owned at the effective date of
the Reincorporation Merger.
Immediately prior to the effectiveness of the Reincorporation
Merger, the Companys authorized capital stock consisted of
1,600,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per
share, 14,400,000 shares of preference stock, par value
$0.01 per share and 132,000,000 shares of common stock, of
which 19,284,850 shares were outstanding and
5,432,080 shares were held in treasury. No preferred stock
or preference stock was issued or outstanding.
At the time of the Reincorporation Merger and at
December 31, 2009, the Companys authorized capital
stock consisted of 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock and
500,000,000 shares of common stock. The board of directors
has the right to set the dividend, voting, conversion,
liquidation and other rights, as well as the qualifications,
limitations and restrictions, with respect to the preferred
stock. As of December 23, 2009 and giving effect to the
Reincorporation Merger, the Company had 19,284,850 shares
of common stock issued and outstanding, with no shares held in
treasury, and no preferred stock issued or outstanding. As of
December 31, 2009, the Company had 480,715,150 shares
of common stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock
available for issuance.
In December 2002, the board of directors authorized the purchase
of up to 4.0 million shares of its outstanding common stock
in the open market or privately negotiated transactions. No
shares were repurchased under this authorization and the board
of directors terminated this authorization on November 3,
2009.
|
|
Note 9.
|
Net
(Loss) Income Per Common Share Information
|
Net (loss) income per common share basic
is computed by dividing Net (loss) income by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Net
loss per common share diluted for 2009 and
2008 was the same as Net loss per common share
basic since the Company reported a net loss and therefore,
the effect of all potentially dilutive securities on the net
loss would have been antidilutive. Net income per common
share diluted for 2007 was computed by
dividing Net income by the weighted average number
of shares plus the potential common share effect of dilutive
stock options computed using the treasury stock method.
The following table details the potential common shares excluded
from the calculation of Net (loss) income per common
share diluted because the associated exercise
prices were greater than the average market price of
29
HARBINGER
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the Companys common stock, or because their impact would
be antidilutive due to the Companys net loss for the
period (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Potential common shares excluded from the calculation of
Net (loss) income per common share
diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Weighted average exercise price per share
|
|
$
|
5.49
|
|
|
$
|
5.12
|
|
|
$
|
9.79
|
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(34
|
)
|
Federal
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(662
|
)
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Federal
|
|
|
(8,493
|
)
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
(1,616
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes
|
|
$
|
(8,566
|
)
|
|
$
|
98
|
|
|
$
|
(2,313
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table reconciles the expected benefit (provision)
for income taxes for all periods computed using the
U.S. Federal statutory rate of 34% to the (Provision)
benefit for income taxes as reflected in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Benefit (provision) at statutory rate
|
|
$
|
1,626
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
(1,653
|
)
|
Net operating loss and credit carryforward limitations due to
ownership change
|
|
|
(7,376
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
|
|
|
(2,794
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
165
|
|
Non-deductible professional fees and advisory services
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in tax reserve
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes, net of Federal benefit
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
Federal personal holding company tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(575
|
)
|
Change in estimated liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of deferred rate change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes
|
|
$
|
(8,566
|
)
|
|
$
|
98
|
|
|
$
|
(2,313
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
HARBINGER
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Temporary differences and tax credit carryforwards that gave
rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and
liabilities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,424
|
|
|
$
|
1,212
|
|
Accruals not yet deductible
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
512
|
|
Net operating loss carryforward
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
Alternative minimum tax credit
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
7,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,212
|
|
|
|
9,063
|
|
Less valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2,698
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
9,056
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
514
|
|
|
$
|
9,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys net deferred tax assets are reflected in the
Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
8,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
514
|
|
|
$
|
9,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 2009 Change of Control resulted in an ownership change under
sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (the IRC). As a result, the
Companys ability to utilize pre-ownership change net
operating loss (NOL) carryforwards of
$3.3 million and alternative minimum tax (AMT)
credits of $6.6 million was eliminated. The
$3.3 million of NOL carryforwards included approximately
$0.3 million which has not been recognized for financial
statement purposes as they relate to benefits associated with
stock option exercises that have not reduced current taxes
payable.
The Company has $1.9 million of post-ownership change NOL
carryforwards. However, in accordance with the accounting for
stock-based compensation, approximately $61,000 of these
carryforwards have not been recognized for financial statement
purposes as they relate to benefits associated with stock option
exercises that have not reduced current taxes payable. Equity
will be increased by $21,000 if and when such deferred tax
assets are ultimately realized. The Company uses the ordering
model prescribed by the liability method of accounting for
income taxes when determining when excess tax benefits have been
realized.
The Companys ability to utilize its NOL carryforward tax
benefits is dependent on future taxable income. NOL
carryforwards have a
20-year
carry-forward period and will expire in 2029. Additionally, the
Company has approximately $0.5 million in refundable
Federal AMT credits resulting from AMT net operating loss
carryback provisions contained in tax legislation enacted during
the fourth quarter of 2009.
Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when,
in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that
some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for
the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of
enactment. Cumulative losses weigh heavily in the overall
assessment of the need for a valuation allowance. As a result of
its cumulative losses in recent years, the Company determined
that, as of December 31, 2009, a valuation allowance was
required for all of its deferred tax
31
HARBINGER
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
assets other than the refundable AMT credits. Consequently, the
Companys valuation allowance, which related only to state
NOL carryforward tax benefits in previous years, increased from
$7,000 as of December 31, 2008 to $2.7 million as of
December 31, 2009.
The Company also applies the accounting guidance for uncertain
tax positions which prescribes a minimum recognition threshold a
tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the
financial statements. Unrecognized tax benefits were
approximately $0.7 million as of December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008. The reversal of these benefits will
reduce the Companys effective tax rate when recognized.
The Company expects that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits
will be reduced by half during the next 12 months. The
following is a roll-forward of the Companys total
uncertain tax positions (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
732
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
|
|
|
|
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
732
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
|
|
|
|
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
732
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
|
|
|
|
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest expense and penalties, if any, related to the
above uncertain tax positions are recorded in (Provision)
benefit for income taxes. For the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the amount of interest
expense and penalties was $19,000, $16,000 and $0, respectively.
The Company files Federal and state consolidated income tax
returns and is subject to income tax examinations for years
after 2005. The Company currently has state tax returns under
examination for the years 2006 and 2007.
If the Company has another change of ownership under
section 382 of the IRC, utilization of NOL carryforward tax
benefits could be significantly limited or possibly eliminated.
An ownership change for this purpose is generally a change in
the majority ownership of a company over a three-year period.
Section 541 of the IRC subjects a corporation that is a
personal holding company (PHC), as
defined in the IRC, to a 15% tax on undistributed personal
holding company income in addition to the
corporations normal income tax. Generally, undistributed
PHC income is based on taxable income, subject to certain
adjustments, most notably a reduction for Federal income taxes.
Personal holding company income is comprised primarily of
passive investment income plus, under certain circumstances,
personal service income. A corporation is generally considered
to be a personal holding company if (1) 60% or more of its
adjusted ordinary gross income is personal holding company
income and (2) 50% or more of its outstanding common stock
is owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals
at any time during the last half of the taxable year.
Although the Company believes that it is classified as a PHC for
2009, the Company did not incur a PHC tax as it had a net
operating loss for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Additionally, subsequent to the 2009 Change of
32
HARBINGER
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Control, the Company may continue to qualify as a PHC in future
periods. If it is determined that five or fewer individuals hold
more than 50% in value of the Companys outstanding common
stock during the second half of future tax years, it is possible
that the Company could have at least 60% of adjusted ordinary
gross income consist of PHC income as discussed above. Thus,
there can be no assurance that the Company will not be subject
to this tax in the future, which, in turn, may materially and
adversely impact the Companys financial position, results
of operations and cash flows. In addition, if the Company is
subject to this tax in future periods, statutory tax rate
increases could significantly increase its tax expense and
adversely affect its consolidated operating results and cash
flows. Specifically, the current 15% tax rate on undistributed
PHC income is scheduled to expire as of December 31, 2010,
after which the rate will revert back to the highest individual
ordinary income rate of 39.6%.
|
|
Note 11.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Lease
Commitments
Future annual minimum payments under non-cancelable operating
lease obligations as of December 31, 2009 are approximately
$45,000 payable during the year ending December 31, 2010.
Rental expense for leases was $69,000, $76,000 and $69,000 in
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Legal
and Environmental Matters
During 2004, Utica Mutual Insurance Company (Utica
Mutual) commenced an action against the Company in the
Supreme Court for the County of Oneida, State of New York,
seeking reimbursement under a general agreement of indemnity
entered into by the Company in the late 1970s. Based upon the
discovery to date, Utica Mutual is seeking reimbursement for
payments it claims to have made under (1) a workers
compensation bond and (2) certain reclamation bonds which
were issued to certain former subsidiaries and are alleged by
Utica Mutual to be covered by the general agreement of
indemnity. While the precise amount of Utica Mutuals claim
is unclear, it appears they are claiming approximately
$0.5 million, of which approximately $0.2 million
appears to have been paid out in connection with the workers
compensation bond with the balance of $0.3 million due for
payment on the reclamation bonds.
During 2005, the Company was notified by Weatherford
International Inc. (Weatherford) of a claim for
reimbursement of approximately $0.2 million in connection
with the investigation and cleanup of purported environmental
contamination at two properties formerly owned by a
non-operating subsidiary of the Company. The claim was made
under an indemnification provision given by the Company to
Weatherford in a 1995 asset purchase agreement and relates to
alleged environmental contamination that purportedly existed on
the properties prior to the date of the sale. Weatherford has
also advised the Company that it anticipates that further
remediation and cleanup may be required, although Weatherford
has not provided any information regarding the cost of any such
future clean up. The Company has challenged any responsibility
to indemnify Weatherford. The Company believes that it has
meritorious defenses to the claim, including that the alleged
contamination occurred after the sale of the property, and
intends to vigorously defend against it.
In addition to the matters described above, the Company is
involved in other litigation and claims incidental to its
current and prior businesses. The Company has reserves for all
of its legal and environmental matters aggregating approximately
$0.3 million and $0.1 million at December 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively. Although the outcome of these
matters cannot be predicted with certainty and some of these
matters may be disposed of unfavorably to the Company, based on
currently available information, including legal defenses
available to the Company, and given the aforementioned reserves
and related insurance coverage, the Company does not believe
that the outcome of these legal and environmental matters will
have a material effect on its financial position, liquidity, or
results of operations.
33
HARBINGER
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Captive
Insurance Arrangement
During a two year period commencing in 1993, the Company entered
into a
rent-a-captive
arrangement for workers compensation insurance coverage
whereby the Company funded premiums in an account maintained by
an offshore entity related to a sponsor insurance carrier based
in the United States. Due to significant liquidity concerns, the
sponsor insurance company entered into voluntary rehabilitation
during 2002. Based on this event, the Company wrote off the
balance of the excess collateral arising from this arrangement.
In September 2009, the Company received a refund of
$0.8 million representing excess collateral relating to
this arrangement and recorded this refund in Other
income in the Companys Consolidated Statement of
Operations for the year ended December 31, 2009. There is
one remaining open claim for this period which is above the
Companys deductible and significantly below policy limits.
Accordingly, the Company does not believe that it has any
material obligations under this arrangement and does not expect
to receive additional material reimbursements.
Guarantees
Throughout its history, the Company has entered into
indemnifications in the ordinary course of business with
customers, suppliers, service providers, business partners and,
in certain instances, when it sold businesses. Additionally, the
Company has indemnified its directors and officers who are, or
were, serving at the request of the Company in such capacities.
Although the specific terms or number of such arrangements is
not precisely known due to the extensive history of past
operations, costs incurred to settle claims related to these
indemnifications have not been material to the Companys
financial statements. Further, the Company has no reason to
believe that future costs to settle claims related to its former
operations will have material impact on its financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
|
|
Note 12.
|
Defined
Benefit Plans
|
General
The Company has a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan
(the Pension Plan) covering certain current and
former U.S. employees. During 2006, the Pension Plan was
frozen which caused all existing participants to become fully
vested in their benefits.
Additionally, the Company has an unfunded supplemental pension
plan (the Supplemental Plan) which provides
supplemental retirement payments to certain former senior
executives of the Company. The amounts of such payments equal
the difference between the amounts received under the Pension
Plan and the amounts that would otherwise be received if Pension
Plan payments were not reduced as the result of the limitations
upon compensation and benefits imposed by Federal law. Effective
December 1994, the Supplemental Plan was frozen.
34
HARBINGER
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Consolidated
Obligations and Funded Status
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Change in Benefit Obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
17,034
|
|
|
$
|
18,170
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
|
|
1,091
|
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
1,835
|
|
|
|
(588
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(1,466
|
)
|
|
|
(1,639
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
|
18,504
|
|
|
|
17,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Plan Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets at fair value at beginning of year
|
|
|
14,026
|
|
|
|
20,239
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
2,217
|
|
|
|
(4,678
|
)
|
Company contributions
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(1,466
|
)
|
|
|
(1,639
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets at fair value at end of year
|
|
|
14,881
|
|
|
|
14,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded Status of Plans
|
|
$
|
(3,623
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,008
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts Recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued and other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
(104
|
)
|
|
$
|
(104
|
)
|
Pension liabilities
|
|
|
(3,519
|
)
|
|
|
(2,904
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$
|
(3,623
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,008
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
loss consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
$
|
(17,650
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,945
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
|
(17,650
|
)
|
|
|
(17,945
|
)
|
Cumulative deferred tax effects
|
|
|
6,738
|
|
|
|
6,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(10,912
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,207
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components
of net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
|
|
1,091
|
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(968
|
)
|
|
|
(1,517
|
)
|
|
|
(1,539
|
)
|
Amortization of actuarial loss
|
|
|
881
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
$
|
1,014
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company expects to recognize approximately $0.9 million
in pension expense during 2010. This amount is comprised of
approximately $0.9 million of net actuarial losses, which
will be amortized out of accumulated other comprehensive loss
and included as a component of net periodic benefit cost,
approximately $1.0 million of interest costs, offset by
approximately $1.0 million of expected return on plan
assets.
35
HARBINGER
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Components
of actuarial adjustments to pension plans, net of tax
effects
The components of Actuarial adjustments to pension plans,
net of tax effects included in Comprehensive Income
(Loss) reported in the accompanying Consolidated Statement
of Changes in Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss) are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net actuarial (loss) gain arising during the year
|
|
$
|
(586
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,607
|
)
|
|
$
|
212
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized net actuarial loss to net periodic
benefit cost
|
|
|
881
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
Deferred tax benefit (provision)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,786
|
|
|
|
(304
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial adjustments to pension plans, net of tax effects
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
|
$
|
(3,273
|
)
|
|
$
|
483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
Plan Information
The accumulated benefit obligation for the Pension Plan was
$17.7 million and $16.3 million at December 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively. The fair value of the Pension Plan
assets was $14.9 million and $14.0 million at
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.66
|
%
|
|
|
6.75
|
%
|
|
|
6.25
|
%
|
Assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.75
|
%
|
|
|
6.25
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
Expected long-term return on plan assets
|
|
|
7.25
|
%
|
|
|
7.75
|
%
|
|
|
7.75
|
%
|
The Company is responsible for establishing objectives and
policies for the investment of Pension Plan assets with
assistance from the Pension Plans investment consultant.
As the obligations are relatively long-term in nature, the
investment strategy has been to maximize long-term capital
appreciation. The Pension Plan has historically invested within
and among equity and fixed income asset classes in a manner that
sought to achieve the highest rate of return consistent with a
moderate amount of volatility. At the same time, the Pension
Plan maintained a sufficient amount invested in highly liquid
investments to meet immediate and projected cash flow needs. To
achieve these objectives, the Company developed guidelines for
the composition of investments to be held by the Pension Plan.
Due to varying rates of return among asset classes, the actual
asset mix may vary somewhat from these guidelines but are
generally rebalanced as soon as practical.
Pension Plan Assets. Asset allocations and
target asset allocations by asset category are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
Plan Investment
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Allocation Guidelines
|
Asset Category
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Min
|
|
Target
|
|
Max
|
|
Domestic equity securities
|
|
|
53
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
International equity securities
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, no plan assets were
invested in the Companys common stock.
36
HARBINGER
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
For 2009, the Company assumed a long-term asset rate of return
of 7.25%. In developing this rate of return assumption, the
Company evaluated historical returns and asset class return
expectations based on the Pension Plans current asset
allocation. Despite the Companys belief that this
assumption is reasonable, future actual results may differ from
this estimate.
Fair value measurements for the Pension Plans assets at
December 31, 2009 are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs(1)
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Domestic equity securities
|
|
$
|
7,878
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,878
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
International equity securities
|
|
|
1,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
5,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
14,881
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,881
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All Pension Plan investments are invested in and among equity
and fixed income asset classes through collective trusts. As
each collective trusts valuation is based on inputs that
are observable or derived principally from observable inputs,
all amounts are categorized under Level 2. |
Contributions. The Company plans to make no
contributions to its Pension Plan in 2010. However, based on the
currently enacted minimum pension plan funding requirements, the
Company expects to make contributions during 2011.
Estimated Future Benefit Payments. The
following benefit payments are expected to be paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
1,395
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,367
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,372
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,378
|
|
2014
|
|
|
1,393
|
|
Years
2015-2019
|
|
|
6,869
|
|
Supplemental
Plan Information
The accumulated benefit obligation for the Supplemental Plan was
$0.8 million and $0.7 million at December 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.66
|
%
|
|
|
6.75
|
%
|
|
|
6.25
|
%
|
Assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.75
|
%
|
|
|
6.25
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
Supplemental Plan Assets. The Supplemental
Plan is unfunded and has no assets.
37
HARBINGER
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Contributions. The Company plans to make no
contributions to its Supplemental Plan in 2010 as the
Supplemental Plan is an unfunded plan. Estimated future benefit
payments will be made by the Company in accordance with the
schedule below.
Estimated Future Benefit Payments. The
following benefit payments are expected to be paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
2011
|
|
|
98
|
|
2012
|
|
|
93
|
|
2013
|
|
|
88
|
|
2014
|
|
|
83
|
|
Years
2015-2019
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
Note 13.
|
Defined
Contribution Plan
|
The Company has a 401(k) Plan (the 401(k) Plan) in
which eligible participants may defer a fixed amount or a
percentage of their eligible compensation, subject to
limitations. The Company makes a discretionary matching
contribution of up to 4% of eligible compensation. The Company
recognized expenses for contributions to the 401(k) Plan of
approximately $28,000, $25,000 and $24,000 in 2009, 2008 and
2007 respectively.
|
|
Note 14.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
The Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 included $2,000, $0 and
$17,000, respectively, of share-based compensation costs,
included in General and administrative. The total income
tax benefit recognized in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations for share-based compensation arrangements was $1,000,
$0 and $1,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008
and 2007, respectively.
On December 5, 1996, the Companys stockholders
approved a long-term incentive plan (the 1996 Plan).
The 1996 Plan provides for the granting of restricted stock,
stock appreciation rights, stock options and other types of
awards to key employees of the Company. Under the 1996 Plan,
options may be granted at prices equivalent to the market value
of the common stock on the date of grant. Options become
exercisable in one or more installments on such dates as the
Company may determine. Unexercised options will expire on
varying dates up to a maximum of ten years from the date of
grant. All options granted vest ratably over three years
beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant. The
1996 Plan, as amended, provides for the issuance of options to
purchase up to 8,000,000 shares of common stock. At
December 31, 2009, stock options covering a total of
1,645,152 shares had been exercised and a total of
5,862,808 shares of common stock are available for future
stock options or other awards under the Plan. As of
December 31, 2009, there were options for the purchase of
up to 492,040 shares of common stock outstanding under the
1996 Plan. No restricted stock, stock appreciation rights or
other types of awards have been granted under the 1996 Plan.
In May 2002, the Companys stockholders approved specific
stock option grants of 8,000 options to each of the six
non-employee directors of the Company. These grants had been
approved by the board of directors and awarded by the Company in
March 2002, subject to stockholder approval. These grants are
non-qualified options with a ten year life and became
exercisable in cumulative one-third installments vesting
annually beginning on the first anniversary of the date of
grant. As of December 31, 2009, there were options for the
purchase of up to 32,000 shares outstanding under these
grants.
The fair value of each stock option granted has been determined
using the Black-Sholes option-pricing model. In 2009, stock
options were granted with a grant date fair value of $2.63 with
the following assumptions used in the
38
HARBINGER
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
determination of fair value of each stock option granted using
the Black-Scholes option pricing model: expected option term of
6 years, volatility of 32.6%, risk-free interest rate of
3.1% and no assumed dividend yield. No stock options were
granted in 2008 or 2007.
A summary of the Companys stock option activity as of
December 31, 2009, and changes during the year then ended,
is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2009
|
|
|
427,040
|
|
|
$
|
5.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
$
|
7.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(16,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired
|
|
|
(12,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
10.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
524,040
|
|
|
$
|
5.49
|
|
|
|
4.6 years
|
|
|
$
|
805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
399,040
|
|
|
$
|
5.01
|
|
|
|
2.9 years
|
|
|
$
|
804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
524,040
|
|
|
$
|
5.49
|
|
|
|
4.6 years
|
|
|
$
|
805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $61,000,
$0 and $0.8 million, respectively. In connection with these
exercises, the Company remitted $0, $0 and $0.2 million for
the payment of withholding taxes during the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The stock
options exercised during 2009 and 2007 were net
exercises, pursuant to which the optionee received shares
of common stock equal to the intrinsic value of the options
(fair market value of common stock on date of exercise less
exercise price) reduced by any applicable withholding taxes. The
Company issued approximately 8,000, 0 and 92,000 shares of
common stock during 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, related
to these exercises.
As of December 31, 2009, there was approximately
$0.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements. That
cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period
of 3.0 years.
|
|
Note 15.
|
Quarterly
Financial Data (unaudited)
|
The following table presents certain unaudited consolidated
operating results for each of the Companys preceding eight
quarters. The Company believes that the following information
includes all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments, except as disclosed in Notes 2 and 3 to the
table) necessary for a fair presentation in accordance with
GAAP. The operating results for any interim period are not
necessarily indicative of results for any other period. The
following unaudited quarterly results reflect restated amounts
from the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q/A
for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on December 22, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009(2)
|
|
|
2009(3)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(1,200
|
)
|
|
|
(1,173
|
)
|
|
|
(1,401
|
)
|
|
|
(2,516
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to Harbinger Group Inc.
|
|
|
(727
|
)
|
|
|
(462
|
)
|
|
|
(8,498
|
)
|
|
|
(3,657
|
)
|
Net loss per common share basic and diluted(1)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.44
|
)
|
|
|
(0.19
|
)
|
39
HARBINGER
GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(865
|
)
|
|
|
(688
|
)
|
|
|
(856
|
)
|
|
|
(828
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Harbinger Group Inc.
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
(456
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per common share basic and
diluted(1)
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net income (loss) per common share has been computed
independently for each quarter based upon the weighted average
shares outstanding for that quarter. Therefore, the sum of the
quarterly amounts may not equal the reported annual amounts. |
|
(2) |
|
During the third quarter of 2009 as a result of the 2009 Change
of Control, the Company wrote off approximately
$8.2 million of net operating loss carryforward tax
benefits and alternative minimum tax credits in accordance with
sections 382 and 383 of the IRC. Approximately
$7.9 million of this write off impacted the income tax
provision as $0.3 million of the $8.2 million had not
been recognized for financial statement purposes as they related
to benefits associated with stock option exercises that had not
reduced current taxes payable. See Note 10. |
|
(3) |
|
Due to tax law changes enacted during the fourth quarter of
2009, the Company was able to re-establish approximately
$0.5 million of AMT credits previously written off during
the third quarter of 2009. However during the fourth quarter of
2009, the Company increased its valuation allowance on all
deferred tax assets other than refundable AMT credits by
approximately $2.8 million. See Note 10. |
|
|
Note 16.
|
Subsequent
Events
|
Insurance
Settlement
During January 2010, the Company entered into a settlement
agreement under a solvent scheme of arrangement with an insurer
in the London market. Under the terms of the agreement, the
Company agreed to accept approximately $0.2 million in
exchange for the termination of insurance coverage on certain
non-operating subsidiaries. A solvent scheme is the mechanism by
which solvent entities, including insurance companies, are able
to shed liabilities and terminate their insurance and
reinsurance obligations with judicial sanction. Such
arrangements are authorized by Section 425 of the U.K.
Companies Act of 1985. The Company received the settlement
during the first quarter of 2010 which will be reflected in
Other income in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations for that quarter.
Management
and Advisory Services Agreement
During February 2010, the Company entered into a management
agreement with Harbinger Capital Partners LLC (HCP),
an affiliate of the Companys Principal Stockholders,
whereby HCP may, among other items, provide advisory and
consulting services to the Company. The Company has agreed to
reimburse HCP for its out-of-pocket expenses and the cost of
certain services performed by legal and accounting personnel of
HCP under the agreement.
40
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was performed under the supervision of the
Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer
(CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO),
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
the Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e))
as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on
that evaluation, the Companys management, including the
CEO and CFO, concluded that, as of December 31, 2009, the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective
to ensure that information we are required to disclose in
reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the Commissions rules and forms.
The Companys previously filed
Form 10-Q/A
for the period ended September 30, 2009 stated that
the Company did not maintain effective controls over the
application and monitoring of its accounting for income taxes.
Specifically, the Company did not have controls designed and in
place to ensure the accuracy and completeness of financial
information provided by third party tax advisors used in
accounting for income taxes and the determination of deferred
income tax assets and the related income tax provision and the
review and evaluation of the application of generally accepted
accounting principles relating to accounting for income taxes.
This control deficiency resulted in the restatement of the
Companys unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2009.
Accordingly, management determined that this control deficiency
constituted a material weakness as of September 30, 2009.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the
Companys Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial
Officer have concluded that the Companys ongoing
remediation efforts (as described below) resulted in control
enhancements which have operated for an adequate period of time
to demonstrate operating effectiveness.
This section of Item 9A, Evaluation of Disclosure
Controls and Procedures, should be read in conjunction
with the Item 4 contained in the Companys
Form 10-Q/A
for the period ended September 30, 2009.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, there can be no assurance that
the Companys disclosure controls and procedures will
detect or uncover all failures of persons within the Company to
disclose material information otherwise required to be set forth
in the Companys periodic reports. There are inherent
limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure
controls and procedures, includes the possibility of human error
and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and
procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and
procedures can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance
of achieving their control objectives.
Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Companys management is responsible for establishing
and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting for the Company, as such term is defined in Exchange
Act
Rule 13a-15(f).
Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the Companys assets; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of the financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures are being made only with proper authorizations; and
(3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or
timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition
of the Companys assets that could have a material effect
on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
These inherent limitations are an intrinsic part of the
financial reporting process. Therefore, although the
Companys management is unable to eliminate this risk, it
is possible to develop safeguards to reduce it. Also,
projections
41
of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject
to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Companys management, under the supervision of and with
the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2009 based on criteria for effective control
over financial reporting described in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). Based on this assessment, the Companys
management concluded that its internal control over financial
reporting was effective as of December 31, 2009 in
accordance with the COSO criteria.
The independent registered public accounting firm that audited
the financial statements included in the annual report
containing the disclosure required by this Item 9A Controls
and Procedures has issued an attestation report on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Changes
in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
Management determined that, as of September 30, 2009 the
Company did not maintain controls designed and in place to
ensure the accuracy and completeness of financial information
provided by third party tax advisors used in accounting for
income taxes and the determination of deferred income tax assets
and the related income tax provision and the review and
evaluation of the application of generally accepted accounting
principles relating to accounting for income taxes. Accordingly,
management previously determined that this control deficiency
constituted a material weakness in the Companys internal
control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2009.
Management believes that, as of December 31, 2009, it has
effectively executed its remediation plans that were established
to address the material weakness in its internal controls
surrounding the accounting for income taxes. These enhancements
involve a more thorough review of our accounting for income
taxes, including engaging tax counsel and other tax advisers in
a more robust quarterly discussion and analysis, particularly
with regard to unusual items, which has improved the review and
oversight process relating to the internal controls over the
Companys accounting for income taxes. This process has and
should continue to improve the review and oversight process
relating to the internal controls over the Companys
accounting for income taxes.
The aforementioned changes in the Companys internal
control over financial reporting during the quarter ended
December 31, 2009 materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information.
|
In August 2009, the Company submitted to the NYSE its Annual CEO
Certification with respect to its compliance with the NYSE
corporate governance listing standards. Additionally, the
certifications pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302
are filed as exhibits to this report.
PART III
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance,
Item 11. Executive Compensation, Item 12. Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters, Item 13. Certain Relationships
and Related Transactions, and Director Independence and
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14
will be furnished on or prior to April 30, 2010 (and is
hereby incorporated by reference) by an amendment hereto or
pursuant to a definitive proxy statement involving the election
of directors pursuant to Regulation 14A that will contain
such information. Notwithstanding the foregoing, information
appearing in the section Audit Committee Report
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in this
Form 10-K.
42
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits,
Financial Statement Schedules.
|
|
|
(a)
|
List of
Documents Filed.
|
(1) Financial Statements (Included in Item 8 of
this report)
Financial Statements, Harbinger Group Inc. and Subsidiaries:
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and
2008.
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity and Comprehensive
Income (Loss) for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
All schedules have been omitted since they are either not
applicable or the information is contained elsewhere in
Item 8 of this report.
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description of Exhibits
|
|
2.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 4, 2009, by
and between, Zapata Corporation (Zapata), a Nevada
corporation, and Harbinger Group Inc., a Delaware corporation
and wholly-owned subsidiary of Zapata (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K filed December 28, 2009 (File No. 1-4219)).
|
3.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Harbinger Group Inc.
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 28,
2009 (File No. 1-4219)).
|
3.2
|
|
Bylaws of Harbinger Group Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K
filed December 28, 2009 (File No. 1-4219)).
|
10.1
|
|
Zapata Supplemental Pension Plan effective as of April 1, 1992
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 1992 (File No. 1-4219)).
|
10.2
|
|
Zapata Amended and Restated 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 3, 2007
(File No. 1-4219)).
|
10.3
|
|
Investment and Distribution Agreement between Zap.Com and Zapata
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to
Zap.Coms Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed April
13, 1999, as amended (File No. 333-76135)).
|
10.4
|
|
Services Agreement between Zap.Com and Zapata (Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit No. 10.2 to Zap.Coms
Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed April 13, 1999, as
amended (File
No. 333-76135)).
|
10.5
|
|
Tax Sharing and Indemnity Agreement between Zap.Com and Zapata
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit No. 10.3 to
Zap.Coms Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 filed March 7, 2008 (File No. 333-76135)).
|
10.6
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement between Zap.Com and Zapata
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit No. 10.4 to
Zap.Coms Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed April
13, 1999, as amended (File No. 333-76135)).
|
43
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description of Exhibits
|
|
10.7
|
|
Form of February 28, 2003 Indemnification Agreement by and among
Zapata and the directors and officers of the Company
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(q) to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002 filed March 26, 2003 (File No. 1-4219)).
|
10.8
|
|
Form of March 1, 2002 Director Stock Option Agreement by
and among Zapata and the non-employee directors of the Company
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(r) to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002 filed March 26, 2003 (File No. 1-4219)).
|
10.9
|
|
Summary of Zapata Corporation Senior Executive Retiree Health
Care Benefit Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10(u) to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2006 filed March 13, 2007 (File No.
1-4219)).
|
10.10
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement by and among Zapata and
Zap.Com Corporation and the Directors or Officers of Zapata and
Zap.Com Corporation. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 31, 2009 filed November 4, 2009
(File No. 1-4219)).
|
10.11
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement by and among Zapata and the
Directors or Officers of Zapata only. (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 31, 2009 filed
November 4, 2009 (File No. 1-4219)).
|
10.12*
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement by and among Harbinger Group
Inc. and its Directors or Officers.
|
10.13
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 4, 2009, by
and between Zapata Corporation, a Nevada corporation, and
Harbinger Group Inc., a Delaware corporation. (Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2009 filed November 4, 2009 (File No. 1-4219)).
|
10.14
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of the 24th day of December,
2009, by and between Francis T. McCarron and Harbinger Group
Inc., a Delaware corporation. (Incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K
filed December 28, 2009 (File No. 1-4219)).
|
10.15
|
|
Retention and Consulting Agreement, dated as of January 22, 2010
by and between Harbinger Group Inc. and Leonard DiSalvo.
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 28, 2010
(File No. 1-4219)).
|
10.16
|
|
Management and Advisory Services Agreement, entered into as of
March 1, 2010, by and between Harbinger Capital Partners
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and Harbinger Group
Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed March 5, 2010 (File No. 1-4219)).
|
21*
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
|
23.1*
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of CEO Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of CFO Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1*
|
|
Certification of CEO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
32.2*
|
|
Certification of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required
to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to the requirements of
Item 15(a)(3) of
Form 10-K. |
|
* |
|
Filed herewith |
44
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
Harbinger Group Inc.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Francis
T. Mccarron
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(on behalf of the Registrant and as Principal
Financial Officer)
March 8, 2010
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Philip
A. Falcone
(Philip
A. Falcone)
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
and Director
|
|
March 8, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Francis
T. Mccarron
(Francis
T. McCarron)
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer)
|
|
March 8, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Leonard
Disalvo
(Leonard
DiSalvo)
|
|
Vice President Finance (Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
March 8, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Lap
Wai Chan
(Lap
Wai Chan)
|
|
Director
|
|
March 8, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Lawrence
M. Clark, Jr.
(Lawrence
M. Clark, Jr.)
|
|
Director
|
|
March 8, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Peter
A. Jenson
(Peter
A. Jenson)
|
|
Director
|
|
March 8, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert
V. Leffler, Jr.
(Robert
V. Leffler, Jr.)
|
|
Director
|
|
March 8, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Keith
M. Hladek
(Keith
M. Hladek)
|
|
Director
|
|
March 8, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Thomas
M. Hudgins
(Thomas
M. Hudgins)
|
|
Director
|
|
March 8, 2010
|
exv10w12
Exhibit 10.12
Form of Indemnification Agreement by and among Harbinger Group Inc. and its Directors or Officers
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
This Indemnification Agreement (Agreement) is made on , by and between
Harbinger Group Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), and
(Indemnitee).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Company desires to attract and retain the services of highly qualified
individuals, such as Indemnitee, to serve the Company and its affiliates, including but not limited
to Zap.com Corporation;
WHEREAS, in order to induce Indemnitee to continue to provide services to the Company and its
affiliates the Company wishes to provide for the indemnification of, and advancement of expenses
to, Indemnitee to the maximum extent permitted by law;
WHEREAS, the Certificate of Incorporation (the Charter) and the Bylaws (the
Bylaws) of the Company provide for indemnification of the officers and directors of the
Company, and Indemnitee may also be entitled to indemnification pursuant to the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware (the DGCL);
WHEREAS, the Charter, Bylaws and the DGCL expressly provide that the indemnification
provisions set forth therein are not exclusive, and thereby contemplate that contracts may be
entered into between the Company and members of the board of directors, officers and other persons
with respect to indemnification;
WHEREAS, the Company and Indemnitee recognize the continued difficulty in obtaining liability
insurance for the Companys directors, officers, employees, agents and fiduciaries, the significant
and continual increases in the cost of such insurance and the general trend of insurance companies
to reduce the scope of coverage of such insurance;
WHEREAS, the Company and Indemnitee further recognize the substantial increase in corporate
litigation in general, subjecting directors, officers, employees, agents and fiduciaries to
expensive litigation risks at the same time as the availability and scope of coverage of liability
insurance provide increasing challenges for the Company;
WHEREAS, Indemnitee does not regard the protection currently provided by applicable law, the
Companys governing documents and available insurance as adequate under the present circumstances,
and Indemnitee may not be willing to continue to serve in such capacity without additional
protection;
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (the Board) has determined that the
increased difficulty in attracting and retaining highly qualified persons such as Indemnitee is
detrimental to the best interests of the Companys stockholders and that the Company should act to
assure Indemnitee that there will be increased certainty of such protection in the future;
WHEREAS, it is reasonable, prudent and necessary for the Company contractually to obligate
itself to indemnify, and to advance expenses on behalf of, such persons to the fullest extent
permitted by applicable law, regardless of any amendment or revocation of the Charter or Bylaws, so
that they will serve or continue to serve the Company free from undue concern that they will not be
so indemnified;
WHEREAS, the Company and Indemnitee acknowledge and agree that, as contemplated by 6 Del. C. §
2708 (Section 2708) this Agreement involves at least $100,000 and, therefore, the Company
and Indemnitee intend for Section 2708 and the related legislative commentary, which specifies that
Section 2708 was intended to supersede all Delaware common law limitations on the enforceability of
choice of law provisions (including any
47
restrictions contained in the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws), as well as
limitations on contractual consent to jurisdiction or service of process, to apply to this
Agreement; and
WHEREAS, this Agreement is a supplement to and in furtherance of the indemnification provided
in the Charter, Bylaws and the DGCL and any resolutions adopted pursuant thereto, and shall not be
deemed a substitute therefor, nor to diminish or abrogate any rights of Indemnitee thereunder.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the covenants contained herein, the
Company and Indemnitee do hereby covenant and agree as follows:
Section 1. Services to the Company. Indemnitee agrees to serve as [a
director/officer] of the Company. [Subject to the terms and conditions of any employment agreement
between Indemnitee and the Company,] Indemnitee may at any time and for any reason resign from such
position, in which event the Company shall have no obligation under this Agreement to continue
Indemnitee in such position. This Agreement shall not be deemed an employment contract between the
Company (or any of its subsidiaries or any Enterprise) and Indemnitee. The foregoing
notwithstanding, this Agreement shall be effective as of the date the Indemnitee commenced services
as a [director/officer] and continue in force after Indemnitee has ceased to serve as [a
director/officer] of the Company and its affiliates.
|
|
As used in this Agreement: |
(a) Corporate Status describes the status of a person as a current or former
director, officer, employee, agent or trustee of the Company or of any other Enterprise which such
person is or was serving at the request of the Company.
(b) Enforcement Expenses shall include all reasonable attorneys fees, retainers,
court costs, transcript costs, fees of experts, witness fees, travel expenses, duplicating costs,
printing and binding costs, telephone charges, postage, delivery service fees and all other
disbursements or expenses of the types customarily incurred in connection with an action to enforce
indemnification or advancement rights, or an appeal from such action, including, without
limitation, the premium, security for and other costs relating to any cost bond, supersedas bond or
other appeal bond or its equivalent.
(c) Enterprise shall mean any corporation (other than the Company), partnership,
joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other legal entity of which Indemnitee is or was
serving at the request of the Company as a director, officer, employee, agent, trustee or other
Corporate Status.
(d) Expenses shall include all reasonable attorneys fees, retainers, court costs,
transcript costs, fees of experts, witness fees, travel expenses, duplicating costs, printing and
binding costs, telephone charges, postage, delivery service fees and all other disbursements or
expenses of the types customarily incurred in connection with prosecuting, defending, preparing to
prosecute or defend, investigating, being or preparing to be a witness in, or otherwise
participating in, a Proceeding or an appeal resulting from a Proceeding, including, without
limitation, the premium, security for and other costs relating to any cost bond, supersedas bond or
other appeal bond or its equivalent. Expenses, however, shall not include amounts paid in
settlement by Indemnitee or the amount of judgments or fines against Indemnitee.
(e) Independent Counsel means a law firm, or a partner (or, if applicable, member)
of such a law firm, that is experienced in matters of Delaware corporation law and neither
presently is, nor in the past five years has been, retained to represent: (i) the Company,
Harbinger Holdings, LLC, any Enterprise or Indemnitee or any of their affiliates in any matter
material to any such party (other than with respect to matters concerning Indemnitee under this
Agreement, or of other indemnitees under similar indemnification agreements), or (ii) any other
party to the Proceeding giving rise to a claim for indemnification hereunder. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the term Independent Counsel shall not include any person who, under the applicable
standards of professional conduct then prevailing, would have a conflict of interest in
representing either the Company or Indemnitee in an action to determine Indemnitees rights under
this Agreement. The Company agrees to pay the reasonable fees and
48
expenses of the Independent Counsel and to fully indemnify such counsel against any and all
expenses, claims, liabilities and damages arising out of or relating to this Agreement or its
engagement pursuant hereto.]
(f) The term Proceeding shall include any threatened, pending or completed action,
suit, arbitration, alternate dispute resolution mechanism, investigation, inquiry, administrative
hearing or any other actual, threatened or completed proceeding, whether brought in the right of
the Company or otherwise and whether of a civil, criminal, administrative or investigative nature,
in which Indemnitee was, is or will be involved as a party or otherwise by reason of the fact that
Indemnitee is or was a director or officer of the Company or is or was serving at the request of
the Company as a director, officer, employee, agent or trustee of any Enterprise or by reason of
any action taken by him or of any action taken on his part while acting as director or officer of
the Company or while serving at the request of the Company as a director, officer, employee, agent
or trustee of any Enterprise, in each case whether or not serving in such capacity at the time any
liability or expense is incurred for which indemnification, reimbursement or advancement of
expenses can be provided under this Agreement; provided, however, that the term
Proceeding shall not include any action, suit or arbitration, or part thereof, initiated by
Indemnitee to enforce Indemnitees rights under this Agreement as provided for in Section 13(e) of
this Agreement.
Section 3. Indemnity in Third-Party Proceedings. The Company shall indemnify
Indemnitee in accordance with the provisions of this Section 3 if Indemnitee is, or is threatened
to be made, a party to or a participant in any Proceeding, other than a Proceeding by or in the
right of the Company to procure a judgment in its favor. Pursuant to this Section 3, Indemnitee
shall be indemnified against all Expenses, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually
and reasonably incurred by Indemnitee or on his behalf in connection with such Proceeding or any
claim, issue or matter therein, if Indemnitee acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably
believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Company and, in the case of a
criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful.
Section 4. Indemnity in Proceedings by or in the Right of the Company. The Company
shall indemnify Indemnitee in accordance with the provisions of this Section 4 if Indemnitee is, or
is threatened to be made, a party to or a participant in any Proceeding by or in the right of the
Company to procure a judgment in its favor. Pursuant to this Section 4, Indemnitee shall be
indemnified against all Expenses actually and reasonably incurred by him or on his behalf in
connection with such Proceeding or any claim, issue or matter therein, if Indemnitee acted in good
faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the
Company. No indemnification for Expenses shall be made under this Section 4 in respect of any
claim, issue or matter as to which Indemnitee shall have been finally adjudged by a court to be
liable to the Company, unless and only to the extent that the Delaware Court of Chancery (the
Delaware Court) or any court in which the Proceeding was brought shall determine upon
application that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all the circumstances of the
case, Indemnitee is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnification for such expenses as the
Delaware Court or such other court shall deem proper.
Section 5. Indemnification for Expenses of a Party Who is Wholly or Partly Successful.
Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement and except as provided in Section 8, to the
extent that Indemnitee is a party to or a participant in and is successful, on the merits or
otherwise, in any Proceeding or in defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, the Company shall
indemnify Indemnitee against all Expenses actually and reasonably incurred by him or on his behalf
in connection therewith. If Indemnitee is not wholly successful in such Proceeding but is
successful, on the merits or otherwise, as to one or more but less than all claims, issues or
matters in such Proceeding, the Company shall indemnify Indemnitee against all Expenses actually
and reasonably incurred by him or on his behalf in connection with each successfully resolved
claim, issue or matter. For purposes of this Section and without limitation, the termination of
any claim, issue or matter in such a Proceeding by dismissal, with or without prejudice, shall be
deemed to be a successful result as to such claim, issue or matter.
Section 6. Indemnification For Expenses of a Witness. Notwithstanding any other
provision of this Agreement, to the extent that Indemnitee is, by reason of his Corporate Status, a
witness, or is made (or asked to) respond to discovery requests, in any Proceeding to which
Indemnitee is not a party and is not threatened to be made a party, he shall be indemnified against
all Expenses actually and reasonably incurred by him or on his behalf in connection therewith.
Section 7. Additional Indemnification.
49
(a) Except as provided in Section 8, notwithstanding any limitation in Sections 3, 4 or 5, the
Company shall indemnify Indemnitee to the fullest extent permitted by law if Indemnitee is a party
to or is threatened to be made a party to any Proceeding (including a Proceeding by or in the right
of the Company to procure a judgment in its favor) against all Expenses, judgments, fines and
amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by Indemnitee in connection with the
Proceeding.
(b) For purposes of Section 7(a), the meaning of the phrase to the fullest extent permitted
by law shall include, but not be limited to:
(i) to the fullest extent permitted by the provision of the DGCL that authorizes or
contemplates additional indemnification by agreement, or the corresponding provision of any
amendment to or replacement of the DGCL or such provision thereof; and
(ii) to the fullest extent authorized or permitted by any amendments to or replacements of the
DGCL adopted after the date of this Agreement that increase the extent to which a corporation may
indemnify its officers and directors.
Section 8. Exclusions. Notwithstanding any provision in this Agreement to the
contrary, the Company shall not be obligated under this Agreement:
(a) to make any indemnity for amounts otherwise indemnifiable hereunder (or for which
advancement is provided hereunder) if and to the extent that Indemnitee has otherwise actually
received such amounts under any insurance policy, contract, agreement or otherwise;
(b) to make any indemnity for an accounting of profits made from the purchase and sale (or
sale and purchase) by Indemnitee of securities of the Company within the meaning of Section 16(b)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or similar provisions of state statutory law or
common law; or
(c) to make any indemnity or advancement that is prohibited by applicable law.
Section 9. Advances of Expenses. The Company shall advance the Expenses incurred by
Indemnitee in connection with any Proceeding, and such advancement shall be made within twenty (20)
days after the receipt by the Company of a statement or statements requesting such advances (which
shall include invoices received by Indemnitee in connection with such Expenses but, in the case of
invoices in connection with legal services, any references to legal work performed or to
expenditures made that would cause Indemnitee to waive any privilege accorded by applicable law
shall not be included with the invoice) from time to time, whether prior to or after final
disposition of any Proceeding. Advances shall be unsecured and interest free. Advances shall be
made without regard to Indemnitees ability to repay the expenses and without regard to
Indemnitees ultimate entitlement to indemnification under the other provisions of this Agreement.
Indemnitee shall qualify for advances upon the execution and delivery to the Company of this
Agreement which shall constitute an undertaking providing that Indemnitee undertakes to the fullest
extent required by law to repay the advance if and to the extent that it is ultimately determined
by a court of competent jurisdiction in a final judgment, not subject to appeal, that Indemnitee is
not entitled to be indemnified by the Company. The right to advances under this paragraph shall in
all events continue until final disposition of any Proceeding, including any appeal therein.
Nothing in this Section 9 shall limit Indemnitees right to advancement pursuant to Section 13(e)
of this Agreement.
|
|
Section 10. Procedure for Notification and Defense of Claim. |
(a) To obtain indemnification under this Agreement, Indemnitee shall submit to the Company a
written request therefor and, if Indemnitee so chooses pursuant to Section 11 of this Agreement,
such written request shall also include a request for Indemnitee to have the right to
indemnification determined by Independent Counsel.
(b) The Company will be entitled to participate in the Proceeding at its own expense.
Section 11. Procedure Upon Application for Indemnification.
50
(a) Upon written request by Indemnitee for indemnification pursuant to Section 10(a), a
determination, if such determination is required by applicable law, with respect to Indemnitees
entitlement thereto shall be made in the specific case: (i) by Independent Counsel in a written
opinion to the Board if Indemnitee so requests in such written request for indemnification pursuant
to Section 10(a), or (ii) by the Company in accordance with applicable law if Indemnitee does not
so request such determination be made by Independent Counsel. In the case that such determination
is made by Independent Counsel, a copy of Independent Counsels written opinion shall be delivered
to Indemnitee and, if it is so determined that Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification, payment
to Indemnitee shall be made within ten (10) days after such determination. Indemnitee shall
cooperate with the Independent Counsel or the Company, as applicable, making such determination
with respect to Indemnitees entitlement to indemnification, including providing to such counsel or
the Company, upon reasonable advance request, any documentation or information which is not
privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure and which is reasonably available to Indemnitee
and reasonably necessary to such determination. Any costs or expenses (including attorneys fees
and disbursements) incurred by Indemnitee in so cooperating with the Independent Counsel or the
Company shall be borne by the Company (irrespective of the determination as to Indemnitees
entitlement to indemnification) and the Company hereby indemnifies and agrees to hold Indemnitee
harmless therefrom.
(b) In the event that Indemnitee exercises his right to have his entitlement to
indemnification determined by Independent Counsel pursuant to Sections 10(a) and 11(a)(i), the
Independent Counsel shall be selected by Indemnitee. The Company may, within ten (10) days after
written notice of such selection, deliver to Indemnitee a written objection to such selection;
provided, however, that such objection may be asserted only on the ground that the
Independent Counsel so selected does not meet the requirements of Independent Counsel as defined
in Section 2 of this Agreement, and the objection shall set forth with particularity the factual
basis of such assertion. Absent a proper and timely objection, the person so selected shall act as
Independent Counsel. If such written objection is so made and substantiated, the Independent
Counsel so selected may not serve as Independent Counsel unless and until such objection is
withdrawn or a court has determined that such objection is without merit. If, within twenty (20)
days after the later of (i) submission by Indemnitee of a written request for indemnification and
Independent Counsel pursuant to Sections 10(a) and 11(a)(i) hereof, respectively, and (ii) the
final disposition of the Proceeding, including any appeal therein, no Independent Counsel shall
have been selected without objection, Indemnitee may petition a court of competent jurisdiction for
resolution of any objection which shall have been made by the Company to the selection of
Independent Counsel and/or for the appointment as Independent Counsel of a person selected by the
court or by such other person as the court shall designate. The person with respect to whom all
objections are so resolved or the person so appointed shall act as Independent Counsel under
Section 11(a) hereof. Upon the due commencement of any judicial proceeding or arbitration pursuant
to Section 13(a) of this Agreement, Independent Counsel shall be discharged and relieved of any
further responsibility in such capacity (subject to the applicable standards of professional
conduct then prevailing).
Section 12. Presumptions and Effect of Certain Proceedings.
(a) In making a determination with respect to entitlement to indemnification hereunder, it
shall be presumed that Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification under this Agreement if Indemnitee
has submitted a request for indemnification in accordance with Section 10(a) of this Agreement, and
the Company shall have the burden of proof to overcome that presumption in connection with the
making of any determination contrary to that presumption. In an action to enforce this Agreement,
neither (i) the failure of the Company or of Independent Counsel to have made a determination prior
to the commencement of any action pursuant to this Agreement that indemnification is proper in the
circumstances because Indemnitee has met the applicable standard of conduct, nor (ii) an actual
determination by the Company or by Independent Counsel that Indemnitee has not met such applicable
standard of conduct, shall be a defense to the action or create a presumption that Indemnitee has
not met the applicable standard of conduct.
(b) Indemnitee shall be deemed to have acted in good faith to the extent Indemnitees action
is based on the records or books of account of the Company or any other Enterprise, including
financial statements, or on information supplied to Indemnitee by the officers of the Company or
any other Enterprise in the course of their duties, or on the advice of legal counsel for the
Company or any other Enterprise, or for any committee of the Board or the board of directors of any
other Enterprise, or on information or records given or reports made to the
51
Company or any other Enterprise, or to any committee of the Board or the board of directors of
any other Enterprise, by an independent certified public accountant or by an appraiser or other
expert selected with reasonable care by the Company or any other Enterprise, or by any committee of
the Board or the board of directors of any other Enterprise.
(c) The termination of any Proceeding or of any claim, issue or matter therein, by judgment,
order, settlement or conviction, or upon a plea of guilty, nolo contendere or its
equivalent, shall not (except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement) of itself
adversely affect the right of Indemnitee to indemnification or create a presumption that Indemnitee
did not act in good faith or in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to
the best interests of the Company or, with respect to any criminal Proceeding, that Indemnitee had
reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful. The Company acknowledges that a
settlement or other disposition short of final judgment may be successful if it permits a party to
avoid expense, delay, distraction, disruption and uncertainty.
(d) The knowledge and/or actions, or failure to act, of any director, officer, agent or
employee of the Company or any Enterprise shall not be imputed to Indemnitee for purposes of
determining the right to indemnification under this Agreement. Whether or not the foregoing
provisions of this Section 12 are satisfied, it shall in any event be presumed that Indemnitee has
at all times acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to
the best interests of the Company. Anyone seeking to overcome this presumption shall have the
burden of proof and the burden of persuasion by clear and convincing evidence.
Section 13. Remedies of Indemnitee.
(a) Subject to Section 13(f), in the event that (i) a determination is made pursuant to
Section 11 of this Agreement that Indemnitee is not entitled to indemnification under this
Agreement, (ii) advancement of Expenses is not timely made pursuant to Section 9 of this Agreement,
(iii) Indemnitee has submitted a request for indemnification that does not include a request for
Independent Counsel and no determination of entitlement to indemnification shall have been made
pursuant to Section 11(a) of this Agreement within sixty (60) days after receipt by the Company of
such request, (iv) Indemnitee has submitted a request for indemnification that does include a
request for Independent Counsel and no determination of entitlement to indemnification shall have
been made pursuant to Section 11(a) of this Agreement within sixty (60) days after either (A) the
ten (10) day period for objection to the selection of Independent Counsel has expired with no
objection made or (B), if such an objection has been made, resolution of any such objection, (v)
payment of indemnification is not made pursuant to Section 5 or 6 or the last sentence of Section
11(a) of this Agreement within ten (10) days after receipt by the Company of a written request
therefor, or (vi) payment of indemnification pursuant to Section 3, 4 or 7 of this Agreement is not
made within ten (10) days after a determination has been made that Indemnitee is entitled to
indemnification, Indemnitee shall be entitled to an adjudication by a court of his entitlement to
such indemnification or advancement. Alternatively, Indemnitee, at his option, may seek an award
in arbitration to be conducted by a single arbitrator pursuant to the Commercial Arbitration Rules
of the American Arbitration Association. Indemnitee shall commence such proceeding seeking an
adjudication or an award in arbitration within 180 days following the date on which Indemnitee
first has the right to commence such proceeding pursuant to this Section 13(a); provided,
however, that the foregoing time limitation shall not apply in respect of a proceeding
brought by Indemnitee to enforce his rights under Section 5 of this Agreement. The Company shall
not oppose Indemnitees right to seek any such adjudication or award in arbitration.
(b) In the event that a determination shall have been made pursuant to Section 11(a) of this
Agreement that Indemnitee is not entitled to indemnification, any judicial proceeding or
arbitration commenced pursuant to this Section 13 shall be conducted in all respects as a de novo
trial, or arbitration, on the merits and Indemnitee shall not be prejudiced by reason of that
adverse determination. In any judicial proceeding or arbitration commenced pursuant to this
Section 13, the Company shall have the burden of proving Indemnitee is not entitled to
indemnification or advancement, as the case may be.
(c) If a determination shall have been made pursuant to Section 11(a) of this Agreement that
Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification, the Company shall be bound by such determination in any
judicial proceeding or arbitration commenced pursuant to this Section 13, to the fullest extent
permitted by law.
52
(d) The Company shall be precluded from asserting in any judicial proceeding or arbitration
commenced pursuant to this Section 13 that the procedures and presumptions of this Agreement are
not valid, binding and enforceable and shall stipulate in any such court or before any such
arbitrator that the Company is bound by all the provisions of this Agreement.
(e) The Company shall indemnify Indemnitee against any and all Enforcement Expenses and, if
requested by Indemnitee, subject to Section 9, shall (within ten (10) days after receipt by the
Company of a written request therefor) advance, to the extent not prohibited by law, such
Enforcement Expenses to Indemnitee, which are incurred by Indemnitee in connection with any action
brought by Indemnitee for indemnification or advancement from the Company under this Agreement or
under any directors and officers liability insurance policies maintained by the Company,
regardless of whether Indemnitee ultimately is determined to be entitled to such indemnification,
advancement or insurance recovery, as the case may be, in the suit for which indemnification or
advancement is being sought.
(f) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, no determination as to
entitlement to indemnification under this Agreement shall be required to be made prior to the final
disposition of the Proceeding, including any appeal therein.
|
|
Section 14. Non-exclusivity; Survival of Rights; Insurance. |
(a) The rights of indemnification and to receive advancement as provided by this Agreement
shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which Indemnitee may at any time be entitled
under applicable law, the Charter, the Bylaws, any agreement, a vote of stockholders or a
resolution of directors, or otherwise. No amendment, alteration or repeal of this Agreement or of
any provision hereof shall limit or restrict any right of Indemnitee under this Agreement in
respect of any action taken or omitted by such Indemnitee in his Corporate Status prior to such
amendment, alteration or repeal. To the extent that a change in Delaware law, whether by statute
or judicial decision, permits greater indemnification or advancement than would be afforded
currently under the Charter, Bylaws and this Agreement, it is the intent of the parties hereto that
Indemnitee shall enjoy by this Agreement the greater benefits so afforded by such change. No right
or remedy herein conferred is intended to be exclusive of any other right or remedy, and every
other right and remedy shall be cumulative and in addition to every other right and remedy given
hereunder or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or otherwise. The assertion or
employment of any right or remedy hereunder, or otherwise, shall not prevent the concurrent
assertion or employment of any other right or remedy.
(b) To the extent that the Company or any of its affiliates maintains an insurance policy or
policies providing liability insurance for directors, officers, employees, agents or trustees of
the Company or of any other Enterprise, Indemnitee shall be covered by such policy or policies in
accordance with its or their terms to the maximum extent of the coverage available for any such
director, officer, employee, agent or trustee under such policy or policies. If, at the time of
the receipt of a notice of a claim pursuant to the terms hereof, the Company has director and
officer liability insurance in effect, the Company shall give prompt notice of the commencement of
such proceeding to the insurers in accordance with the procedures set forth in the respective
policies. The Company shall thereafter take all necessary or desirable action to cause such
insurers to pay, on behalf of Indemnitee, all amounts payable as a result of such proceeding in
accordance with the terms of such policies.
(c) The Companys obligation to provide indemnification or advancement hereunder to Indemnitee
who is or was serving at the request of the Company as a director, officer, employee, agent or
trustee of any other Enterprise shall be reduced by any amount Indemnitee has actually received as
indemnification or advancement from such other Enterprise.
(d) All references in this Agreement to the Company shall include Zapata Corporation
(Zapata) during the period of time prior to the merger of Zapata with and into the
Company.
Section 15. Duration of Agreement. This Agreement shall continue until and terminate
upon the later of: (a) ten (10) years after the date that Indemnitee shall have ceased to serve as
a director or officer (or in any other Corporate Status) of any of the Company or its affiliates or
(b) one (1) year after the final termination of any Proceeding, including any appeal, then pending
in respect of which Indemnitee is granted rights of indemnification
53
or advancement hereunder and of any proceeding, including any appeal, commenced by Indemnitee
pursuant to Section 13 of this Agreement relating thereto. This Agreement shall be binding upon
the Company and its successors and assigns and shall inure to the benefit of Indemnitee and his
heirs, executors and administrators. The Company shall require and cause any successor, and any
direct or indirect parent of any successor, whether direct or indirect by purchase, merger,
consolidation or otherwise, to all, substantially all or a substantial part, of the business and/or
assets of the Company, by written agreement in form and substance satisfactory to Indemnitee,
expressly to assume and agree to perform this Agreement in the same manner and to the same extent
that the Company would be required to perform if no such succession had taken place.
Section 16. Severability. If any provision or provisions of this Agreement shall be
held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable for any reason whatsoever: (a) the validity, legality
and enforceability of the remaining provisions of this Agreement (including, without limitation,
each portion of any section of this Agreement containing any such provision held to be invalid,
illegal or unenforceable, that is not itself invalid, illegal or unenforceable) shall not in any
way be affected or impaired thereby and shall remain enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by
law; (b) such provision or provisions shall be deemed reformed to the extent necessary to conform
to applicable law and to give the maximum effect to the intent of the parties hereto; and (c) to
the fullest extent possible, the provisions of this Agreement (including, without limitation, each
portion of any section of this Agreement containing any such provision held to be invalid, illegal
or unenforceable, that is not itself invalid, illegal or unenforceable) shall be construed so as to
give effect to the intent manifested thereby.
Section 17. Enforcement.
(a) The Company expressly confirms and agrees that it has entered into this Agreement and
assumed the obligations imposed on it hereby in order to induce Indemnitee to serve as a
[director/officer] of the Company, and the Company acknowledges that Indemnitee is relying upon
this Agreement in serving as a [director/officer] of the Company.
(b) This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to
the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, oral, written and
implied, between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof; provided,
however, that this Agreement is a supplement to and in furtherance of the Charter, the
Bylaws, applicable law and prior agreements, and shall not be deemed a substitute therefor, nor to
diminish or abrogate any rights of Indemnitee thereunder. For the avoidance of doubt, this
Agreement shall not diminish or abrogate any rights of Indemnitee with regard to indemnification or
advancement agreements undertaken with Zapata.
Section 18. Modification and Waiver. No supplement, modification or amendment, or
waiver of any provision, of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing by the
parties thereto. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed or shall
constitute a waiver of any other provisions of this Agreement nor shall any waiver constitute a
continuing waiver.
Section 19. Notice by Indemnitee. Indemnitee agrees promptly to notify the Company in
writing upon being served with any summons, citation, subpoena, complaint, indictment, information
or other document relating to any Proceeding or matter which may be subject to indemnification or
advancement as provided hereunder. The failure of Indemnitee to so notify the Company shall not
relieve the Company of any obligation which it may have to Indemnitee under this Agreement or
otherwise.
Section 20. Notices. All notices, requests, demands and other communications under
this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if (a) delivered by
hand and receipted for by the party to whom said notice or other communication shall have been
directed, (b) mailed by certified or registered mail with postage prepaid, on the third business
day after the date on which it is so mailed, (c) mailed by reputable overnight courier and
receipted for by the party to whom said notice or other communication shall have been directed or
(d) sent by facsimile transmission, with receipt of oral confirmation that such transmission has
been received:
54
(a) If to Indemnitee, to:
Attn: [INDEMNITEE]
(b) If to the Company to:
Harbinger Group Inc.
450 Park Avenue, 30th Floor
New York, NY 10022
or to any other address as may have been furnished to Indemnitee by the Company.
Section 21. Contribution.
(a) Whether or not the indemnification provided for in this Agreement is available, in respect
of any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding in which the Company is jointly
liable with Indemnitee (or would be if joined in such action, suit or proceeding), the Company
shall pay, in the first instance, the entire amount of any judgments, fines, penalties, excise
taxes, amounts paid or to be paid in settlement and Expenses without requiring Indemnitee to
contribute to such payment and the Company hereby waives and relinquishes any right of contribution
it may have against Indemnitee. The Company shall not enter into any settlement of any action,
suit or proceeding in which the Company is jointly liable with Indemnitee (or would be if joined in
such action, suit or proceeding) unless such settlement provides for a full and final release of
all claims asserted against Indemnitee.
(b) Without diminishing or impairing the obligations of the Company set forth in the preceding
subparagraph, if, for any reason, Indemnitee shall elect or be required to pay all or any portion
of any judgment or settlement in any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding in
which the Company is jointly liable with Indemnitee (or would be if joined in such action, suit or
proceeding), the Company shall contribute to the amount of judgments, fines, penalties, excise
taxes, amounts paid or to be paid in settlement and Expenses actually and reasonably incurred and
paid or payable by Indemnitee in proportion to the relative benefits received by the Company and
all officers, directors or employees of the Company, other than Indemnitee, who are jointly liable
with Indemnitee (or would be if joined in such action, suit or proceeding), on the one hand, and
Indemnitee, on the other hand, from the transaction from which such action, suit or proceeding
arose; provided, however, that the proportion determined on the basis of relative
benefit may, to the extent necessary to conform to law, be further adjusted by reference to the
relative fault of the Company and all officers, directors or employees of the Company other than
Indemnitee who are jointly liable with Indemnitee (or would be if joined in such action, suit or
proceeding), on the one hand, and Indemnitee, on the other hand, in connection with the events
that resulted in such Expenses, judgments, fines or settlement amounts, as well as any other
equitable considerations which applicable law may require to be considered. The relative fault of
the Company and all officers, directors or employees of the Company, other than Indemnitee, who are
jointly liable with Indemnitee (or would be if joined in such action, suit or proceeding), on the
one hand, and Indemnitee, on the other hand, shall be determined by reference to, among other
things, the degree to which their actions were motivated by intent to gain personal profit or
advantage, the degree to which their liability is primary or secondary and the degree to which
their conduct is active or passive.
(c) The Company hereby agrees to fully indemnify and hold Indemnitee harmless from any claims
of contribution which may be brought by officers, directors or employees of the Company or its
affiliates, other than Indemnitee, who may be jointly liable with Indemnitee.
Section 22. Applicable Law and Consent to Jurisdiction. This Agreement and the legal
relations among the parties shall be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with,
the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to its conflict of laws rules. Except with
respect to any arbitration commenced by Indemnitee pursuant to Section 13(a) of this Agreement, the
Company and Indemnitee hereby irrevocably and unconditionally (i) agree that any action or
proceeding arising out of or in connection with this Agreement shall be brought only in the
Delaware Court, and not in any other state or federal court in the United States of America or any
court in any other country, (ii) consent to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Delaware
Court for
55
purposes of any action or proceeding arising out of or in connection with this Agreement,
(iii) consent to service of process at the address set forth in Section 20 of this Agreement with
the same legal force and validity as if served upon such party personally within the State of
Delaware, (iv) waive any objection to the laying of venue of any such action or proceeding in the
Delaware Court and (v) waive, and agree not to plead or to make, any claim that any such action or
proceeding brought in the Delaware Court has been brought in an improper or inconvenient forum.
Section 23. Identical Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more
counterparts, each of which shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original but all of which
together shall constitute one and the same Agreement. Only one such counterpart signed by the
party against whom enforceability is sought needs to be produced in order to evidence the existence
of this Agreement.
Section 24. Miscellaneous. The headings of the paragraphs of this Agreement are
inserted for convenience only and shall not be deemed to constitute part of this Agreement or to
affect the construction thereof.
56
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be signed as of the day and year
first above written.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HARBINGER GROUP INC. |
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[INDEMNITEE] |
|
|
|
|
Name: |
57
Schedule to Exhibit 10.12 Form of Indemnification Agreement by and
Among Harbinger Group Inc. and its Directors and Officers
The Indemnification Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.12 is substantially identical in all
material respects to the indemnification agreements which have been entered into by
Harbinger Group Inc. and the following directors and officers with the associated
effective dates:
|
|
|
Indemnitee |
|
Effective Date |
Lap Wai Chan
|
|
December 23, 2009 |
Leonard DiSalvo
|
|
December 23, 2009 |
Lawrence M. Clark, Jr.
|
|
December 23, 2009 |
Philip A. Falcone
|
|
December 23, 2009 |
Peter A. Jenson
|
|
December 23, 2009 |
Robert V. Leffler, Jr.
|
|
December 23, 2009 |
Keith M. Hladek
|
|
December 23, 2009 |
Thomas M. Hudgins
|
|
December 23, 2009 |
Francis T. McCarron
|
|
December 23, 2009 |
58
exv21
Exhibit 21
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Place of Incorporation |
Zap.Com Corporation |
|
Nevada |
The foregoing does not constitute a complete list of all subsidiaries of the registrant. The
subsidiaries that have been omitted do not, if considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary,
constitute a Significant Subsidiary as defined by the Securities Exchange Commission.
exv23w1
Exhibit 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to incorporation by reference
in Registration Statement Nos. 333-43223, 333-45568, and 333-124693 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 26, 2010, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Harbinger Group Inc., and the effectiveness of Harbinger Group Inc.s
internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Harbinger
Group Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Rochester, New York
March 8, 2010
exv31w1
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OR 15d-14 OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Philip A. Falcone, certify that:
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Harbinger Group Inc.; |
|
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report; |
|
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report; |
|
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions): |
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
Date:
March 9, 2010 |
|
|
|
/s/ Philip A. Falcone
Philip A. Falcone
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
exv31w2
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OR 15d-14 OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Francis T. McCarron, certify that:
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Harbinger Group Inc.; |
|
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report; |
|
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report; |
|
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions): |
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
Date:
March 9, 2010
|
|
|
/s/ Francis T. McCarron
Francis T. McCarron
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
exv32w1
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of Harbinger Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Philip A. Falcone, as Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:
|
(1) |
|
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
|
(2) |
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|
|
|
/s/ Philip A. Falcone
Philip A. Falcone
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
March 9, 2010 |
|
|
This Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
exv32w2
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of Harbinger Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Francis T. McCarron, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:
|
(1) |
|
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
|
(2) |
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|
|
|
/s/ Francis T. McCarron
Francis T. McCarron
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
March 9, 2010 |
|
|
This Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.